128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34515365)
21. Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy.
Yang I; Becker MP
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 9290225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Continued controversy in using latent class models for estimating diagnostic accuracy without a gold standard.
Albert PS
Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4764-4765. PubMed ID: 34515366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Identifiability of models for multiple diagnostic testing in the absence of a gold standard.
Jones G; Johnson WO; Hanson TE; Christensen R
Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):855-63. PubMed ID: 19764953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Using latent class models to characterize and assess relative error in discrete measurements.
Espeland MA; Handelman SL
Biometrics; 1989 Jun; 45(2):587-99. PubMed ID: 2765639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Latent class models for Echinococcus multilocularis diagnosis in foxes in Switzerland in the absence of a gold standard.
Otero-Abad B; Armua-Fernandez MT; Deplazes P; Torgerson PR; Hartnack S
Parasit Vectors; 2017 Dec; 10(1):612. PubMed ID: 29258612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
Qu Y; Tan M; Kutner MH
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):797-810. PubMed ID: 8805757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A statistical method was used for the meta-analysis of tests for latent TB in the absence of a gold standard, combining random-effect and latent-class methods to estimate test accuracy.
Sadatsafavi M; Shahidi N; Marra F; FitzGerald MJ; Elwood KR; Guo N; Marra CA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):257-69. PubMed ID: 19692208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimation of operating characteristics for dependent diagnostic tests based on latent Markov models.
Cook RJ; Ng ET; Meade MO
Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1109-17. PubMed ID: 11129468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
Walsh T
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests in the absence of a perfect gold-standard test: a review of the statistical and epidemiologic issues.
Hadgu A; Dendukuri N; Hilden J
Epidemiology; 2005 Sep; 16(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 16135935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian latent class models (STARD-BLCM).
Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Dendukuri N; Dhand NK; Toft N; Gardner IA
Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3603-3604. PubMed ID: 28675923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sophisticated diagnostic modalities.
Zou KH; Liu A
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Jul; 366(1874):2251-2. PubMed ID: 18407891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Group testing for case identification with correlated responses.
Lendle SD; Hudgens MG; Qaqish BF
Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):532-40. PubMed ID: 21950447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests with intermediate results in the absence of a gold standard.
Xu H; Black MA; Craig BA
Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2571-84. PubMed ID: 23212851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects.
Goetghebeur E; Liinev J; Boelaert M; Van der Stuyft P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Jun; 9(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 11084706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy: A "Rule of Three" for data with repeated observations but without a gold standard.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4815-4829. PubMed ID: 34161623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of raters without a gold standard by exploiting a group of experts.
Zhang B; Chen Z; Albert PS
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23006010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A penalized latent class model for ordinal data.
Desantis SM; Houseman EA; Coull BA; Stemmer-Rachamimov A; Betensky RA
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):249-62. PubMed ID: 17626225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
