These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34515669)

  • 1. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of an Endoscopist Audit and Feedback Report for Colonoscopy.
    Tinmouth J; Sutradhar R; Li Q; Patel J; Baxter NN; Llovet D; Paszat LF; Rabeneck L
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2021 Oct; 116(10):2042-2051. PubMed ID: 34515669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nationally Automated Colonoscopy Performance Feedback Increases Polyp Detection: The NED APRIQOT Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Catlow J; Sharp L; Wagnild J; Lu L; Bhardwaj-Gosling R; Ogundimu E; Kasim A; Brookes M; Lee T; McCarthy S; Gray J; Sniehotta F; Valori R; Westwood C; McNally R; Ruwende J; Sinclair S; Deane J; ; Rutter M
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Sep; 22(9):1926-1936. PubMed ID: 38759827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of colonoscopic performance between medical and nurse endoscopists: a non-inferiority randomised controlled study in Asia.
    Hui AJ; Lau JY; Lam PP; Chui AO; Fan AS; Lam TY; Tse YK; Tang RS; Ng SC; Wu JC; Ching JY; Wong MC; Chan FK; Sung J
    Gut; 2015 Jul; 64(7):1058-62. PubMed ID: 25524261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Control System Incorporated With Deep Learning Improved Endoscopist Performance in a Pretest and Post-Test Trial.
    Yao L; Liu J; Wu L; Zhang L; Hu X; Liu J; Lu Z; Gong D; An P; Zhang J; Hu G; Chen D; Luo R; Hu S; Yang Y; Yu H
    Clin Transl Gastroenterol; 2021 Jun; 12(6):e00366. PubMed ID: 34128480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial.
    Pohl H; Bensen SP; Toor A; Gordon SR; Levy LC; Berk B; Anderson PB; Anderson JC; Rothstein RI; MacKenzie TA; Robertson DJ
    Endoscopy; 2015 Oct; 47(10):891-7. PubMed ID: 26126162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic imaging-assisted colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Teshima CW; Zepeda-Gómez S; AlShankiti SH; Sandha GS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Sep; 20(36):13178-84. PubMed ID: 25278714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
    Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual feedback and monitoring of endoscopist performance improves the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a prospective case-control study.
    Ishibashi F; Fukushima K; Kobayashi K; Kawakami T; Tanaka R; Kato J; Sato A; Konda K; Sugihara K; Baba S
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2566-2575. PubMed ID: 32468263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colon polypectomy report card improves polypectomy competency: results of a prospective quality improvement study (with video).
    Duloy AM; Kaltenbach TR; Wood M; Gregory DL; Keswani RN
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jun; 89(6):1212-1221. PubMed ID: 30825535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audit and feedback interventions to improve endoscopist performance: Principles and effectiveness.
    Tinmouth J; Patel J; Hilsden RJ; Ivers N; Llovet D
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):473-85. PubMed ID: 27345652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to Make Feedback More Effective? Qualitative Findings from Pilot Testing of an Audit and Feedback Report for Endoscopists.
    Webster F; Patel J; Rice K; Baxter N; Paszat L; Rabeneck L; Tinmouth J
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016; 2016():4983790. PubMed ID: 27722149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of colonoscopy performance among gastroenterology and surgical trainees: a need for common training standards for all trainees?
    Leyden JE; Doherty GA; Hanley A; McNamara DA; Shields C; Leader M; Murray FE; Patchett SE; Harewood GC
    Endoscopy; 2011 Nov; 43(11):935-40. PubMed ID: 21997723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Point-of-care, peer-comparator colonoscopy practice audit: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Quality Program--Endoscopy.
    Armstrong D; Hollingworth R; Macintosh D; Chen Y; Daniels S; Gittens S; Bridges R; Sinclair P; Dubé C
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jan; 25(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 21258663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rates: Outcomes of quality improvement program.
    Gurudu SR; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Atia M; Umar SB; Leighton JA; Faigel DO; Ramirez FC
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):645-649. PubMed ID: 28892839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic endoscopic imaging versus standard colonoscopy in a routine colonoscopy setting: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Holme Ö; Höie O; Matre J; Stallemo A; Garborg K; Hasund A; Wiig H; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 21481862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.