These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34516200)

  • 1. Worse is bad: Divergent inferences from logically equivalent comparisons.
    Inbar Y; Evers E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Mar; 151(3):665-675. PubMed ID: 34516200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames.
    Sher S; McKenzie CR
    Cognition; 2006 Oct; 101(3):467-94. PubMed ID: 16364278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A fundamental asymmetry in human memory: Old ≠ not-new and new ≠ not-old.
    Brainerd CJ; Bialer DM; Chang M; Upadhyay P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1850-1867. PubMed ID: 34843341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Framing fake news: Asymmetric attribute-framing bias for favorable and unfavorable outcomes.
    Kreiner H; Gamliel E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Feb; 48(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 34694825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence from the future.
    Gong T; Bramley NR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Mar; 153(3):864-872. PubMed ID: 38236250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applying fuzzy-trace theory to attribute-framing bias: Gist and verbatim representations of quantitative information.
    Gamliel E; Kreiner H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):497-506. PubMed ID: 31282723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When good is stickier than bad: Understanding gain/loss asymmetries in sequential framing effects.
    Sparks J; Ledgerwood A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Aug; 146(8):1086-1105. PubMed ID: 28425745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When "bad" is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.
    Schweickart O; Tam C; Brown NR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Mar; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 32597668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explaining risky choices with judgments: Framing, the zero effect, and the contextual relativity of gist.
    Reyna VF; Brainerd CJ; Chen Z; Bookbinder SH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1037-1053. PubMed ID: 33914575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positivity helps the medicine go down: Leveraging framing and affective contexts to enhance the likelihood to take medications.
    Minton AR; Young NA; Nievera MA; Mikels JA
    Emotion; 2021 Aug; 21(5):1062-1073. PubMed ID: 33180530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hypothetical and certain inferences from conditional arguments read in texts.
    Campion N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):547-58. PubMed ID: 16719665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgment and judgment latency for freedom and responsibility relatedness as a function of subtle linguistic variations.
    Wilkerson K; McGahan JR; Stevens R; Williamson D; Low J
    J Psychol; 2009 Dec; 143(6):641-56. PubMed ID: 19957880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A framing effect of intertemporal and spatial choice.
    Kuang Y; Huang YN; Li S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1298-1320. PubMed ID: 35848147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focus to an attribute with verbal or numerical quantifiers affects the attribute framing effect.
    Liu D; Juanchich M; Sirota M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103088. PubMed ID: 32497741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of speed-accuracy trade-off on attribute-framing bias.
    Kreiner H; Gamliel E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jun; 49(6):926-940. PubMed ID: 37079845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linguistic framing effects in business and refugee aid contexts: A replication and extension of Cooley et al. (2017).
    Garinther A; Arrow H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):e1-e18. PubMed ID: 35708936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Words or numbers? Communicating probability in intelligence analysis.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR
    Am Psychol; 2021 Apr; 76(3):549-560. PubMed ID: 32700939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Setting the empirical record straight: Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust, and replicable.
    Sprouse J; Almeida D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2017 Jan; 40():e311. PubMed ID: 29342740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interattribute evaluation theory.
    Evangelidis I; van Osselaer SMJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1733-1746. PubMed ID: 30714784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.