These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34516214)

  • 1. Contextual cuing of visual search does not guide attention automatically in the presence of top-down goals.
    Luque D; Beesley T; Molinero S; Vadillo MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1080-1090. PubMed ID: 34516214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. There is more to contextual cuing than meets the eye: Improving visual search without attentional guidance toward predictable target locations.
    Vadillo MA; Giménez-Fernández T; Beesley T; Shanks DR; Luque D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jan; 47(1):116-120. PubMed ID: 33180547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Vadillo MA; Pearson D; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 24999706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing.
    Kunar MA; Wolfe JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2077-91. PubMed ID: 21691902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Category-specific learning of color, orientation, and position regularities guide visual search.
    Kershner AM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):907-922. PubMed ID: 37276127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the controllability of contextual cuing of visual search.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Lopez FJ; Alonso R; Shanks DR
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39645. PubMed ID: 28045108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the role of depth information in contextual cuing using a virtual reality visual search task.
    Beesley T; Yun Tou Y; Walsh J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1313-1324. PubMed ID: 36227325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?
    Kunar MA; Flusberg S; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 17683230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-down suppression of negative features applies flexibly contingent on visual search goals.
    Forstinger M; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1120-1147. PubMed ID: 38627277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets.
    Peterson MS; Kramer AF
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Oct; 63(7):1239-49. PubMed ID: 11766947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition of incidentally learned visual search arrays is supported by fixational eye movements.
    Annac E; Pointner M; Khader PH; Müller HJ; Zang X; Geyer T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2147-2164. PubMed ID: 30883169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal contextual memory guides selective attention in visual-search tasks.
    Chen S; Shi Z; Zinchenko A; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Jul; 59(7):e14025. PubMed ID: 35141899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing": Retraction.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Rosenbaum GM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jul; 48(7):782. PubMed ID: 35679190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search.
    Conci M; von Mühlenen A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1514-24. PubMed ID: 19801612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic Guidance (and Misguidance) of Visuospatial Attention by Acquired Scene Memory: Evidence From an N1pc Polarity Reversal.
    Zinchenko A; Conci M; Töllner T; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1531-1543. PubMed ID: 33119432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests.
    Smyth AC; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):403-15. PubMed ID: 18426069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Out with the old: New target templates impair the guidance of visual search by preexisting task goals.
    Berggren N; Nako R; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1156-1168. PubMed ID: 31613124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms.
    Sewell DK; Colagiuri B; Livesey EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1644-1665. PubMed ID: 28840573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.