These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34516377)
1. Getting a Grip on the Impact of Incidental Feedback From Body-Powered and Myoelectric Prostheses. Gonzalez MA; Lee C; Kang J; Gillespie RB; Gates DH IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1905-1912. PubMed ID: 34516377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis. Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrotactile Feedback Improves Grip Force Control and Enables Object Stiffness Recognition While Using a Myoelectric Hand. Chai G; Wang H; Li G; Sheng X; Zhu X IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():1310-1320. PubMed ID: 35533165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users. Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Empirical Evaluation of Force Feedback in Body-Powered Prostheses. Brown JD; Kunz TS; Gardner D; Shelley MK; Davis AJ; Gillespie RB IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Mar; 25(3):215-226. PubMed ID: 27101614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis. Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in quality of movements made with body-powered and myoelectric prostheses during activities of daily living. Engdahl SM; Gates DH Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2021 Apr; 84():105311. PubMed ID: 33812199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses. Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand. Pena AE; Rincon-Gonzalez L; Abbas JJ; Jung R PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210956. PubMed ID: 30650161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ; J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees. Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the effect of non-invasive force feedback on prosthetic grasp force modulation in participants with and without limb loss. Barontini F; Van Straaten M; Catalano MG; Thoreson A; Lopez C; Lennon R; Bianchi M; Andrews K; Santello M; Bicchi A; Zhao K PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285081. PubMed ID: 37141211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Haptic shared control improves neural efficiency during myoelectric prosthesis use. Thomas N; Miller AJ; Ayaz H; Brown JD Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):484. PubMed ID: 36627340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An exploration of grip force regulation with a low-impedance myoelectric prosthesis featuring referred haptic feedback. Brown JD; Paek A; Syed M; O'Malley MK; Shewokis PA; Contreras-Vidal JL; Davis AJ; Gillespie RB J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Nov; 12():104. PubMed ID: 26602538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping. Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential experiences of embodiment between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users. Engdahl SM; Meehan SK; Gates DH Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15471. PubMed ID: 32963290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Closed-loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control? Ninu A; Dosen S; Muceli S; Rattay F; Dietl H; Farina D IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 24801625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Locomotor Adaptation by Transtibial Amputees Walking With an Experimental Powered Prosthesis Under Continuous Myoelectric Control. Huang S; Wensman JP; Ferris DP IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 26057851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]