These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34519629)

  • 41. Bacterial cellulose: recent progress in production and industrial applications.
    Avcioglu NH
    World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2022 Apr; 38(5):86. PubMed ID: 35397756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of K1G4: a new Komagataeibacter strain producing bacterial cellulose from different carbon sources.
    La China S; Bezzecchi A; Moya F; Petroni G; Di Gregorio S; Gullo M
    Biotechnol Lett; 2020 May; 42(5):807-818. PubMed ID: 31983038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Engineering Bacterial Cellulose by Synthetic Biology.
    Singh A; Walker KT; Ledesma-Amaro R; Ellis T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 33276459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Whole genome sequencing analysis of Komagataeibacter nataicola reveals its potential in food waste valorisation for cellulose production.
    Nasharudin MIH; Siew SW; Ahmad HF; Mahmud N
    Mol Biol Rep; 2024 Apr; 51(1):503. PubMed ID: 38600404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Structural properties of optically clear bacterial cellulose produced by Komagataeibacter hansenii using arabitol.
    van Zyl EM; Kennedy MA; Nason W; Fenlon SJ; Young EM; Smith LJ; Bhatia SR; Coburn JM
    Biomater Adv; 2023 May; 148():213345. PubMed ID: 36889229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Exploring the biotic and abiotic drivers influencing nata de coco production by Komagataeibacter nataicola in pre-fermented coconut water.
    Qin X; Yuan Y; Fei S; Lin X; Shi S; Wang X; Pang Q; Kang J; Li C; Liu S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2024 Apr; 414():110620. PubMed ID: 38382414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from fruit and vegetable peels by Komagataeibacter hansenii GA2016.
    Güzel M; Akpınar Ö
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Nov; 162():1597-1604. PubMed ID: 32777420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Developments in bioprocess for bacterial cellulose production.
    Singhania RR; Patel AK; Tseng YS; Kumar V; Chen CW; Haldar D; Saini JK; Dong CD
    Bioresour Technol; 2022 Jan; 344(Pt B):126343. PubMed ID: 34780908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Production of high crystallinity type-I cellulose from Komagataeibacter hansenii JR-02 isolated from Kombucha tea.
    Li J; Chen G; Zhang R; Wu H; Zeng W; Liang Z
    Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2019 Jan; 66(1):108-118. PubMed ID: 30359481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fruit peels support higher yield and superior quality bacterial cellulose production.
    Kumbhar JV; Rajwade JM; Paknikar KM
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Aug; 99(16):6677-91. PubMed ID: 25957154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optimization and physicochemical characterization of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter nataicola and Komagataeibacter maltaceti strains isolated from grape, thorn apple and apple vinegars.
    Greser AB; Avcioglu NH
    Arch Microbiol; 2022 Jul; 204(8):465. PubMed ID: 35802199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rational design of a scalable bioprocess platform for bacterial cellulose production.
    Basu A; Vadanan SV; Lim S
    Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Mar; 207():684-693. PubMed ID: 30600054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In situ and ex situ modifications of bacterial cellulose for applications in tissue engineering.
    Stumpf TR; Yang X; Zhang J; Cao X
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Jan; 82():372-383. PubMed ID: 29025671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bacterial nanocellulose from agro-industrial wastes: low-cost and enhanced production by Komagataeibacter saccharivorans MD1.
    Abol-Fotouh D; Hassan MA; Shokry H; Roig A; Azab MS; Kashyout AEB
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3491. PubMed ID: 32103077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Structural modification of bacterial cellulose fibrils under ultrasonic irradiation.
    Paximada P; Dimitrakopoulou EA; Tsouko E; Koutinas AA; Fasseas C; Mandala IG
    Carbohydr Polym; 2016 Oct; 150():5-12. PubMed ID: 27312607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Novel keratin modified bacterial cellulose nanocomposite production and characterization for skin tissue engineering.
    Keskin Z; Sendemir Urkmez A; Hames EE
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Jun; 75():1144-1153. PubMed ID: 28415399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative genomics of the Komagataeibacter strains-Efficient bionanocellulose producers.
    Ryngajłło M; Kubiak K; Jędrzejczak-Krzepkowska M; Jacek P; Bielecki S
    Microbiologyopen; 2019 May; 8(5):e00731. PubMed ID: 30365246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Characterization and optimization of production of bacterial cellulose from strain CGMCC 17276 based on whole-genome analysis.
    Lu T; Gao H; Liao B; Wu J; Zhang W; Huang J; Liu M; Huang J; Chang Z; Jin M; Yi Z; Jiang D
    Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Mar; 232():115788. PubMed ID: 31952596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Characterization of the Putative Acylated Cellulose Synthase Operon in
    Szymczak I; Pietrzyk-Brzezińska AJ; Duszyński K; Ryngajłło M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The role of genetic manipulation and in situ modifications on production of bacterial nanocellulose: A review.
    Moradi M; Jacek P; Farhangfar A; Guimarães JT; Forough M
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Jul; 183():635-650. PubMed ID: 33957199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.