These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34519908)

  • 1. Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices.
    Fraile C; Ferreiroa A; Romeo M; Alonso R; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1957-1962. PubMed ID: 34519908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral versus extraoral digital occlusal records: a pilot study.
    Fraile C; Ferreiroa A; Solaberrieta E; Pradíes G
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(4):329-333. PubMed ID: 30539175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained by Using An Intraoral Scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Mar; 32(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 35448911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.
    Ries JM; Grünler C; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33888327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner.
    Müller P; Ender A; Joda T; Katsoulis J
    Quintessence Int; 2016 Apr; 47(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 26824085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques.
    Iwauchi Y; Tanaka S; Kamimura-Sugimura E; Baba K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 33775391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
    Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
    J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and reproducibility of the visualization of occlusal contact points using analog articulating foil or digital intraoral scanners in vitro.
    Hennen MV; Blum H; Dammaschke T
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 35851355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study.
    Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners.
    Bohner LOL; De Luca Canto G; Marció BS; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Tortamano Neto P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):617-623. PubMed ID: 28385434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of all-ceramic crowns obtained from conventional and digital impressions: clinical findings.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Ferreiroa A; Valverde A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1745-1751. PubMed ID: 30167795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners.
    Li Z; Huang R; Wu X; Chen Z; Huang B; Chen Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 35904829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of intraoral and extraoral digital impressions: An
    Sason GK; Mistry G; Tabassum R; Shetty O
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 29692563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of digital auricular impression using intraoral scanner versus conventional impression technique for ear rehabilitation: A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Emam NS; Abdallah MF; Abdelaziz MS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Nov; 75(11):4254-4263. PubMed ID: 36117136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.