These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34520500)

  • 1. Effects of automation trust in drivers' visual distraction during automation.
    Zhang Y; Ma J; Pan C; Chang R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257201. PubMed ID: 34520500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.
    Hungund AP; Kumar Pradhan A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107076. PubMed ID: 37150132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver distraction and its effects on partially automated driving performance: A driving simulator study among young-experienced drivers.
    Zangi N; Srour-Zreik R; Ridel D; Chasidim H; Borowsky A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106565. PubMed ID: 35032704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driver's Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign Information Exposure in Complex Environments: A Case Study of the Highways in China.
    Lyu N; Xie L; Wu C; Fu Q; Deng C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 28218696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?
    Huang WC; Fan LH; Han ZJ; Niu YF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107687. PubMed ID: 38943983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration of Trust in Automated Driving: A Matter of Initial Level of Trust and Automated Driving Style?
    Manchon JB; Bueno M; Navarro J
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1613-1629. PubMed ID: 34861787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Young Novice Drivers' Cognitive Distraction Detection: Comparing Support Vector Machines and Random Forest Model of Vehicle Control Behavior.
    Xue Q; Wang X; Li Y; Guo W
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the impact of on-road partially-automated driving on drivers' cognitive workload and attention allocation.
    Biondi FN; Jajo N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 200():107537. PubMed ID: 38471237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiovisual presentation of variable message signs improves message processing in distracted drivers during partially automated driving.
    Pi-Ruano M; Roca J; Tejero P
    J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():172-180. PubMed ID: 38858040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. This Is Your Brain on Autopilot: Neural Indices of Driver Workload and Engagement During Partial Vehicle Automation.
    McDonnell AS; Simmons TG; Erickson GG; Lohani M; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1435-1450. PubMed ID: 34414813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of methods for the assessment of attention while driving.
    Kircher K; Ahlstrom C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 May; 114():40-47. PubMed ID: 28341312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.