These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34520538)

  • 1. Three-year Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial of Class II Restorations Using Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
    Moda MD; Briso AF; Hoshino I; Frascino S; Santos PH; Gonçalves DM; Fagundes TC
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):516-528. PubMed ID: 34520538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up.
    Endo Hoshino IA; Fraga Briso AL; Bueno Esteves LM; Dos Santos PH; Meira Borghi Frascino S; Fagundes TC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5697-5710. PubMed ID: 35556174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial of Class II Restorations Using Low-shrinkage Flowable Resin Composite.
    Frascino S; Fagundes TC; Silva U; Rahal V; Barboza A; Santos PH; Briso A
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 31034347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flowable bulk-fill versus layering restorative material on Class II restorations: A randomized clinical trial.
    Torres CRG; Mailart MC; Moecke SE; Matuda AGN; Veloso SM; da Silva Ávila DM; Nicoló RD; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105154. PubMed ID: 38942111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Resin Composite Viscosity and Fill-technique on Internal Gap in Class I Restorations: An OCT Evaluation.
    Kantovitz KR; Cabral LL; Carlos NR; de Freitas AZ; Peruzzo DC; Franca F; do Amaral F; Basting RT; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2021 Sep; 46(5):537-546. PubMed ID: 34929042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of microleakage and push-out bond strength of various composite resins for sealing the screw-access channel in implant-supported restorations.
    Shim JS; Li CY; Won JE; Ryu JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):764.e1-764.e7. PubMed ID: 36309470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite for restoration of class II cavities - results after three years.
    Cieplik F; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M; Scholz KJ
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104275. PubMed ID: 36044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
    Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Voids in Class II Composite Resin Restorations by Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Pardo Díaz CA; Shimokawa C; Sampaio CS; Freitas AZ; Turbino ML
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31226004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a resin-based sealant with a nano-filled flowable resin composite on sealing performance of marginal defects in resin composites restorations: a 36-months clinical evaluation.
    Estay J; Pardo-Díaz C; Reinoso E; Perez-Iñigo J; Martín J; Jorquera G; Kuga M; Fernández E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Oct; 26(10):6087-6095. PubMed ID: 35608683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
    Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Polymerization Stress and Gap Formation of Self-adhesive, Bulk-fill and Flowable Composite Resins.
    Nakano EL; de Souza A; Boaro L; Catalani LH; Braga RR; Gonçalves F
    Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):E308-E316. PubMed ID: 32516396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Veloso SRM; Lemos CAA; de Moraes SLD; do Egito Vasconcelos BC; Pellizzer EP; de Melo Monteiro GQ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jan; 23(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 29594349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flexural Strength of Conventional or Bulk-fill Resin Composite Repaired with High- or Low-viscosity Restorative Materials.
    Foscarini AV; Barros LS; Turssi CP; França F; Basting RT; Vieira WF
    Oper Dent; 2023 Nov; 48(6):677-688. PubMed ID: 37881103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Canali GD; Ignácio SA; Rached RN; Souza EM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):889-897. PubMed ID: 29948275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the Porosity from Incremental and Bulk Resin Composite Filling Techniques on the Biomechanical Performance of Root-Treated Molars.
    Pereira R; Soares P; Bicalho AA; Barcelos LM; Oliveira L; Soares CJ
    Oper Dent; 2021 Mar; 46(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 34192325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.