236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34520694)
1. Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee CH; Vellayappan B; Tan CH
Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210509. PubMed ID: 34520694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive Predictive Value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Basile G; Cignoli D; Cirulli GO; Sorce G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Cucchiara V; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):697-713. PubMed ID: 33358543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer.
Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Haas M; Cash H; Miller K; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Kaufmann D; Rotzinger R; Lee CH; Asbach P; Hamm B; Penzkofer T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4262-4271. PubMed ID: 32219507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-reader agreement of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version v2.1 for detection of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wen J; Ji Y; Han J; Shen X; Qiu Y
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1013941. PubMed ID: 36248983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Kasel-Seibert M; Lehmann T; Aschenbach R; Guettler FV; Abubrig M; Grimm MO; Teichgraeber U; Franiel T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 26971415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-Reader Variability Using PI-RADS v2 Versus PI-RADS v2.1: Most New Disagreement Stems from Scores 1 and 2.
Beetz NL; Haas M; Baur A; Konietschke F; Roy A; Hamm CA; Rudolph MM; Shnayien S; Hamm B; Cash H; Asbach P; Penzkofer T
Rofo; 2022 Aug; 194(8):852-861. PubMed ID: 35545106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience.
Byun J; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):577-586. PubMed ID: 32045072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics of PI-RADS 4 lesions within the prostatic peripheral zone: a retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating 170 lesions.
Shankar PR; Curci NE; Davenport MS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Aug; 43(8):2176-2182. PubMed ID: 29198006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.0 and V2.1 for Evaluation of Transition Zone Lesions: A 5-Reader 202-Patient Analysis.
Kim N; Kim S; Prabhu V; Shanbhogue K; Smereka P; Tong A; Anthopolos R; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 35405714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Park KJ; Choi SH; Kim MH; Kim JK; Jeong IG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jul; 54(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 33576169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Weighted Diffusion Subtraction for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Sato T; Isoda H; Fujimoto K; Furuta A; Fujimoto M; Ito K; Kobayashi T; Nakamoto Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1979-1988. PubMed ID: 34085328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology.
Giannarini G; Girometti R; Crestani A; Rossanese M; Calandriello M; Cereser L; Bednarova S; Battistella C; Sioletic S; Zuiani C; Valotto C; Ficarra V
Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():191-197. PubMed ID: 30273613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2.1 and PI-RADS version 2 regarding interreader variability and diagnostic accuracy for transition zone prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Zhang D; Zhang X; Bai X; Yan W; Zhou Y; Zhou Z; Xiao Y; Jin Z; Sun H
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4133-4141. PubMed ID: 32918577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of diagnostic performance between two prostate imaging reporting and data system versions: A systematic review.
Li W; Xin C; Zhang L; Dong A; Xu H; Wu Y
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():111-119. PubMed ID: 31005160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
