These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34522014)

  • 1. Anthropocene: event or epoch?
    Bauer AM; Edgeworth M; Edwards LE; Ellis EC; Gibbard P; Merritts DJ
    Nature; 2021 Sep; 597(7876):332. PubMed ID: 34522014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining the anthropocene.
    Lewis SL; Maslin MA
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7542):171-80. PubMed ID: 25762280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geologists reject the Anthropocene as Earth's new epoch - after 15 years of debate.
    Witze A
    Nature; 2024 Mar; 627(8003):249-250. PubMed ID: 38448535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropocene: its stratigraphic basis.
    Zalasiewicz J; Waters C; Head MJ
    Nature; 2017 Jan; 541(7637):289. PubMed ID: 28102252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anthropocene: The human age.
    Monastersky R
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7542):144-7. PubMed ID: 25762264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Humans versus Earth: the quest to define the Anthropocene.
    Subramanian M
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7768):168-170. PubMed ID: 31388169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Define the Anthropocene in terms of the whole Earth.
    Hamilton C
    Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7616):251. PubMed ID: 27535500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The new world of the Anthropocene.
    Zalasiewicz J; Williams M; Steffen W; Crutzen P
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2228-31. PubMed ID: 20184359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epochs: Disputed start dates for Anthropocene.
    Zalasiewicz J
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):436. PubMed ID: 25903617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. All in good time.
    Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7542):129-30. PubMed ID: 25762244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 'Anthropocene' is here to stay - and it's better not as a geological epoch.
    Roland TP; Swindles GT; Ruffell A
    Nature; 2024 Mar; 627(8005):735. PubMed ID: 38531989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Profile of Joel D. Blum.
    Viegas J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(48):30000-30002. PubMed ID: 33229523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why it was right to reject the Anthropocene as a geological epoch.
    Maslin M; Edgeworth M; Ellis EC; Gibbard PL
    Nature; 2024 May; 629(8010):41. PubMed ID: 38689050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The "Anthropocene": neglects, misconceptions, and possible futures: The term "Anthropocene" is often erroneously used, as it is not formally defined yet.
    Rull V
    EMBO Rep; 2017 Jul; 18(7):1056-1060. PubMed ID: 28623189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anthropocene event idea is empowering.
    Kunnas J
    Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7880):257. PubMed ID: 34642473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science in the Sahara: Man of the desert.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7411):272-4. PubMed ID: 22895317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The human epoch.
    Nature; 2011 May; 473(7347):254. PubMed ID: 21593817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carbon cycle: harvest of the century.
    Mayorga E
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7177):405-6. PubMed ID: 18216839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are we in the Anthropocene? Geologists could define new epoch for Earth.
    Prillaman M
    Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7942):14-15. PubMed ID: 36517678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Anthropo-scene: A guide for the perplexed.
    Lorimer J
    Soc Stud Sci; 2017 Feb; 47(1):117-142. PubMed ID: 28195027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.