158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34522358)
1. Effects of consumer surface sterilization on diet DNA metabarcoding data of terrestrial invertebrates in natural environments and feeding trials.
Miller-Ter Kuile A; Apigo A; Young HS
Ecol Evol; 2021 Sep; 11(17):12025-12034. PubMed ID: 34522358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).
Velbel MA; Cockell CS; Glavin DP; Marty B; Regberg AB; Smith AL; Tosca NJ; Wadhwa M; Kminek G; Meyer MA; Beaty DW; Carrier BL; Haltigin T; Hays LE; Agee CB; Busemann H; Cavalazzi B; Debaille V; Grady MM; Hauber E; Hutzler A; McCubbin FM; Pratt LM; Smith CL; Summons RE; Swindle TD; Tait KT; Udry A; Usui T; Westall F; Zorzano MP
Astrobiology; 2022 Jun; 22(S1):S112-S164. PubMed ID: 34904892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing the effectiveness of different wash protocols to remove body surface contaminants in invertebrate food web studies.
Jüds M; Heidemann K; Eitzinger B; Scheu S
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16018. PubMed ID: 38025744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predator-prey interactions of terrestrial invertebrates are determined by predator body size and species identity.
Miller-Ter Kuile A; Apigo A; Bui A; DiFiore B; Forbes ES; Lee M; Orr D; Preston DL; Behm R; Bogar T; Childress J; Dirzo R; Klope M; Lafferty KD; McLaughlin J; Morse M; Motta C; Park K; Plummer K; Weber D; Young R; Young H
Ecology; 2022 May; 103(5):e3634. PubMed ID: 35060625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diet Diversity of the Fluviatile Masu Salmon,
Li L; Yin X; Wan Q; Rusitanmu D; Han J
Biology (Basel); 2024 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 38392347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does pollution influence small mammal diet in the field? A metabarcoding approach in a generalist consumer.
Ozaki S; Fritsch C; Valot B; Mora F; Cornier T; Scheifler R; Raoul F
Mol Ecol; 2018 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 30069953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciphering the diet of a wandering spider (
Sierra Ramírez D; Guevara G; Franco Pérez LM; van der Meijden A; González-Gómez JC; Carlos Valenzuela-Rojas J; Prada Quiroga CF
Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(11):5950-5965. PubMed ID: 34141195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the Efficiency of DNA Metabarcoding to Analyze the Diet of
Lazic T; Pierri C; Corriero G; Balech B; Cardone F; Deflorio M; Fosso B; Gissi C; Marzano M; Nonnis Marzano F; Pesole G; Santamaria M; Gristina M
Life (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34685370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Threats from the air: Damselfly predation on diverse prey taxa.
Kaunisto KM; Roslin T; Forbes MR; Morrill A; Sääksjärvi IE; Puisto AIE; Lilley TM; Vesterinen EJ
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jun; 89(6):1365-1374. PubMed ID: 32124439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the impact of the threatened crucian carp (Carassius carassius) on pond invertebrate diversity: A comparison of conventional and molecular tools.
Harper LR; Lawson Handley L; Sayer CD; Read DS; Benucci M; Blackman RC; Hill MJ; Hänfling B
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3252-3269. PubMed ID: 33002225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
Ji F; Han D; Yan L; Yan S; Zha J; Shen J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150587. PubMed ID: 34582852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying error and accurately interpreting environmental DNA metabarcoding results: A case study to detect vertebrates at arid zone waterholes.
Furlan EM; Davis J; Duncan RP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1259-1276. PubMed ID: 32310337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA metabarcoding multiplexing and validation of data accuracy for diet assessment: application to omnivorous diet.
De Barba M; Miquel C; Boyer F; Mercier C; Rioux D; Coissac E; Taberlet P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Mar; 14(2):306-23. PubMed ID: 24128180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using patterns in prey DNA digestion rates to quantify predator diets.
Uiterwaal SF; DeLong JP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Nov; 20(6):1723-1732. PubMed ID: 32688451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noise pollution alters the diet composition of invertebrate consumers both in and beyond a noise-exposed grassland ecosystem.
Senzaki M; Ando H; Kadoya T
Ecol Lett; 2024 Jan; 27(1):e14323. PubMed ID: 37830457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular gut content analysis of different spider body parts.
Macías-Hernández N; Athey K; Tonzo V; Wangensteen OS; Arnedo M; Harwood JD
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196589. PubMed ID: 29847544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the biodiversity of terrestrial invertebrates on a forested island using DNA barcodes and metabarcoding data.
Dopheide A; Tooman LK; Grosser S; Agabiti B; Rhode B; Xie D; Stevens MI; Nelson N; Buckley TR; Drummond AJ; Newcomb RD
Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01877. PubMed ID: 30811075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metabarcoding dietary analysis of coral dwelling predatory fish demonstrates the minor contribution of coral mutualists to their highly partitioned, generalist diet.
Leray M; Meyer CP; Mills SC
PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1047. PubMed ID: 26137428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA metabarcoding quantifies the relative biomass of arthropod taxa in songbird diets: Validation with camera-recorded diets.
Verkuil YI; Nicolaus M; Ubels R; Dietz MW; Samplonius JM; Galema A; Kiekebos K; de Knijff P; Both C
Ecol Evol; 2022 May; 12(5):e8881. PubMed ID: 35571761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
