BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

786 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34523982)

  • 1. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
    Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
    mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
    Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
    mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
    Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility, stability, and accuracy of microbial profiles by fecal sample collection method in three distinct populations.
    Byrd DA; Chen J; Vogtmann E; Hullings A; Song SJ; Amir A; Kibriya MG; Ahsan H; Chen Y; Nelson H; Knight R; Shi J; Chia N; Sinha R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224757. PubMed ID: 31738775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiota Studies in Bangladesh.
    Vogtmann E; Chen J; Kibriya MG; Chen Y; Islam T; Eunes M; Ahmed A; Naher J; Rahman A; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Ahsan H; Sinha R
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(10):. PubMed ID: 28258145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples for Discovery Metabolomics in Epidemiologic Studies.
    Loftfield E; Vogtmann E; Sampson JN; Moore SC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Nov; 25(11):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 27543620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts.
    Wu Z; Hullings AG; Ghanbari R; Etemadi A; Wan Y; Zhu B; Poustchi H; Fahraji BB; Sakhvidi MJZ; Shi J; Knight R; Malekzadeh R; Sinha R; Vogtmann E
    BMC Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 34809575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
    Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
    Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Metabolomics and Microbiome Analysis of Ethanol versus OMNImet/gene•GUT Fecal Stabilization.
    Isokääntä H; Pinto da Silva L; Karu N; Kallonen T; Aatsinki AK; Hankemeier T; Schimmel L; Diaz E; Hyötyläinen T; Dorrestein PC; Knight R; Orešič M; Kaddurah-Daouk R; Dickens AM; Lamichhane S
    Anal Chem; 2024 Jun; 96(22):8893-8904. PubMed ID: 38782403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
    Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
    BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
    Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
    mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The unique composition of Indian gut microbiome, gene catalogue, and associated fecal metabolome deciphered using multi-omics approaches.
    Dhakan DB; Maji A; Sharma AK; Saxena R; Pulikkan J; Grace T; Gomez A; Scaria J; Amato KR; Sharma VK
    Gigascience; 2019 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 30698687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance comparison of fecal preservative and stock solutions for gut microbiome storage at room temperature.
    Park C; Yun KE; Chu JM; Lee JY; Hong CP; Nam YD; Jeong J; Han K; Ahn YJ
    J Microbiol; 2020 Aug; 58(8):703-710. PubMed ID: 32583287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
    Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.
    Dominianni C; Wu J; Hayes RB; Ahn J
    BMC Microbiol; 2014 Apr; 14():103. PubMed ID: 24758293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies.
    Vogtmann E; Chen J; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(2):115-123. PubMed ID: 27986704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pivotal interplays between fecal metabolome and gut microbiome reveal functional signatures in cerebral ischemic stroke.
    Zhao L; Wang C; Peng S; Zhu X; Zhang Z; Zhao Y; Zhang J; Zhao G; Zhang T; Heng X; Zhang L
    J Transl Med; 2022 Oct; 20(1):459. PubMed ID: 36209079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of the Fecal and Oral Microbiome over 2 Years at -80°C for Multiple Collection Methods.
    Zouiouich S; Byrd DA; Hua X; Karwa S; Wan Y; Shi J; Humphrey GC; Ackermann GL; Knight R; Abnet CC; Vogtmann E; Sinha R
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2023 Mar; 32(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 36649143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gut microbiome comparability of fresh-frozen versus stabilized-frozen samples from hospitalized patients using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
    Ilett EE; Jørgensen M; Noguera-Julian M; Daugaard G; Murray DD; Helleberg M; Paredes R; Lundgren J; Sengeløv H; MacPherson C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13351. PubMed ID: 31527823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
    Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.