167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34524725)
1. Impact of a mid-urethral synthetic mesh sling on long-term risk of systemic conditions in women with stress urinary incontinence: a national cohort study.
Muller P; Gurol-Urganci I; Thakar R; Ehrenstein MR; Van Der Meulen J; Jha S
BJOG; 2022 Mar; 129(4):664-670. PubMed ID: 34524725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Rate of Mesh Sling Removal Following Midurethral Mesh Sling Insertion Among Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Gurol-Urganci I; Geary RS; Mamza JB; Duckett J; El-Hamamsy D; Dolan L; Tincello DG; van der Meulen J
JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(16):1659-1669. PubMed ID: 30357298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of reoperation 10 years after surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a national population-based cohort study.
Muller P; Gurol-Urganci I; van der Meulen J; Thakar R; Jha S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 225(6):645.e1-645.e14. PubMed ID: 34509439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Safety with Sling Mesh Implants for Stress Incontinence.
Chughtai B; Mao J; Matheny ME; Mauer E; Banerjee S; Sedrakyan A
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):183-190. PubMed ID: 32749936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-Term Outcomes After Midurethral Mesh Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Dejene SZ; Funk MJ; Pate V; Wu JM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 28(4):188-193. PubMed ID: 34608036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incontinence rates after midurethral sling revision for vaginal exposure or pain.
Jambusaria LH; Heft J; Reynolds WS; Dmochowski R; Biller DH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):764.e1-764.e5. PubMed ID: 27448731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.
Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Carranza Leon DA; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 26811112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of perioperative adverse events following suburethral sling placement using synthetic mesh, autologous rectus fascia, and autologous fascia lata in a national surgical registry.
Hong CX; Son Y; Patel VJ; Lince K; Gupta P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2024 Apr; 43(4):925-934. PubMed ID: 38426785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association Between the Amount of Vaginal Mesh Used With Mesh Erosions and Repeated Surgery After Repairing Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Chughtai B; Barber MD; Mao J; Forde JC; Normand ST; Sedrakyan A
JAMA Surg; 2017 Mar; 152(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 27902825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.
Brazzelli M; Javanbakht M; Imamura M; Hudson J; Moloney E; Becker F; Wallace S; Omar MI; Shimonovich M; MacLennan G; Ternent L; Vale L; Montgomery I; Mackie P; Saraswat L; Monga A; Craig D
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Mar; 23(14):1-306. PubMed ID: 30929658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cancer Risk After Midurethral Sling Surgery Using Polypropylene Mesh.
Altman D; Rogers RG; Yin L; Tamussino K; Ye W; Iglesia CB
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):469-474. PubMed ID: 29420401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence.
Kokanali MK; Doğanay M; Aksakal O; Cavkaytar S; Topçu HO; Özer İ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():146-50. PubMed ID: 24793930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sling Plication for Failed Midurethral Sling Procedures: A Case Series.
Maheshwari D; Jones K; Solomon E; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):e4-e6. PubMed ID: 30180049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-urethral sling revision for mesh exposure-long-term outcomes of two surgical techniques from a comparative clinical retrospective cohort study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Nikpoor P
BJOG; 2020 Jul; 127(8):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 32107882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling.
Milose JC; Sharp KM; He C; Stoffel J; Clemens JQ; Cameron AP
J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):916-20. PubMed ID: 25245488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
Linder BJ; Trabuco EC; Carranza DA; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1333-6. PubMed ID: 26864666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.
Foss Hansen M; Lose G; Kesmodel US; Gradel KO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):263.e1-263.e8. PubMed ID: 26344752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reoperations for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Finnish National Register Study.
Kurkijärvi K; Aaltonen R; Gissler M; Mäkinen J
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):754-759. PubMed ID: 28753896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
