BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34525406)

  • 1. Methodological challenges for living systematic reviews conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic: A concept paper.
    Iannizzi C; Dorando E; Burns J; Weibel S; Dooley C; Wakeford H; Estcourt LJ; Skoetz N; Piechotta V
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():82-89. PubMed ID: 34525406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience report of two living systematic Cochrane reviews on COVID-19.
    Wagner C; Hirsch C; Siemens W; Kapp P; Iannizzi C
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2024 Mar; 184():90-95. PubMed ID: 38220533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.
    Iannizzi C; Akl EA; Kahale LA; Dorando E; Mosunmola Aminat A; Barker JM; McKenzie JE; Haddaway NR; Piechotta V; Skoetz N
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():802. PubMed ID: 35186269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey.
    Khamis AM; Kahale LA; Pardo-Hernandez H; Schünemann HJ; Akl EA
    F1000Res; 2019; 8():221. PubMed ID: 31231512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing, and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review.
    Iannizzi C; Akl EA; Anslinger E; Weibel S; Kahale LA; Aminat AM; Piechotta V; Skoetz N
    Syst Rev; 2023 Dec; 12(1):238. PubMed ID: 38098023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study.
    Luo J; Chen Z; Liu D; Li H; He S; Zeng L; Yang M; Liu Z; Xiao X; Zhang L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):175. PubMed ID: 37525117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review that is ``rapid'' and ``living'': A specific answer to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Negrini S; Ceravolo MG; Côté P; Arienti C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():194-198. PubMed ID: 34089780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conceptualizing the reporting of living systematic reviews.
    Khabsa J; Chang S; McKenzie JE; Barker JM; Boutron I; Kahale LA; Page MJ; Skoetz N; Akl EA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Apr; 156():113-118. PubMed ID: 36736707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews.
    Breuer C; Meerpohl JJ; Siemens W
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Feb; 176():76-81. PubMed ID: 36702638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of Living Systematic Review for COVID-19.
    Chen Z; Luo J; Li S; Xu P; Zeng L; Yu Q; Zhang L
    Clin Epidemiol; 2022; 14():925-935. PubMed ID: 35958161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Needs and feasibility of living systematic reviews (LSRs): Experience from LSRs on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.
    Külper-Schiek W; Thielemann I; Pilic A; Meerpohl JJ; Siemens W; Vygen-Bonnet S; Koch J; Harder T; Piechotta V
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2024 May; 186():86-91. PubMed ID: 38519357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The life and death of living systematic reviews: a methodological survey.
    Akl EA; El Khoury R; Khamis AM; El Mikati IK; Pardo-Hernandez H; Farran S; Ibrahim R; Khamis M; Hneiny L; Schunemann HJ; Kahale LA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Apr; 156():11-21. PubMed ID: 36764466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.
    Millard T; Synnot A; Elliott J; Green S; McDonald S; Turner T
    Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):325. PubMed ID: 31837703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing process and methods for a living systematic review: 30 search updates and three review updates later.
    Butler AR; Hartmann-Boyce J; Livingstone-Banks J; Turner T; Lindson N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 166():111231. PubMed ID: 38043829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposed triggers for retiring a living systematic review.
    Murad MH; Wang Z; Chu H; Lin L; El Mikati IK; Khabsa J; Akl EA; Nieuwlaat R; Schuenemann HJ; Riaz IB
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Oct; 28(5):348-352. PubMed ID: 36889900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to update a living systematic review and keep it alive during a pandemic: a practical guide.
    Heron L; Buitrago-Garcia D; Ipekci AM; Baumann R; Imeri H; Salanti G; Counotte MJ; Low N
    Syst Rev; 2023 Sep; 12(1):156. PubMed ID: 37660117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal.
    Kahale LA; Elkhoury R; El Mikati I; Pardo-Hernandez H; Khamis AM; Schünemann HJ; Haddaway NR; Akl EA
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():192. PubMed ID: 35136567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Past, present and future of living systematic review: a bibliometrics analysis.
    Zheng Q; Xu J; Gao Y; Liu M; Cheng L; Xiong L; Cheng J; Yuan M; OuYang G; Huang H; Wu J; Zhang J; Tian J
    BMJ Glob Health; 2022 Oct; 7(10):. PubMed ID: 36220305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pragmatic and open science-based solution to a current problem in the reporting of living systematic reviews.
    Metzendorf MI; Weibel S; Reis S; McDonald S
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Aug; 28(4):267-272. PubMed ID: 36351782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.