These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34527047)

  • 1. Recognition Method of Vehicle Cluster Situation Based on Set Pair Logic considering Driver's Cognition.
    Liu S; Wang X; Bai C; Shi H; Zhang Y; Zhong F; Liu Y
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2021; 2021():9809279. PubMed ID: 34527047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research on imaging method of driver's attention area based on deep neural network.
    Zhao S; Li Y; Ma J; Xing Z; Tang Z; Zhu S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):16427. PubMed ID: 36180777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research on a Cognitive Distraction Recognition Model for Intelligent Driving Systems Based on Real Vehicle Experiments.
    Sun Q; Wang C; Guo Y; Yuan W; Fu R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 32784788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Proactive Recognition System for Detecting Commercial Vehicle Driver's Distracted Behavior.
    Yan X; He J; Wu G; Zhang C; Wang C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
    Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian Driver Agent Model for Autonomous Vehicles System Based on Knowledge-Aware and Real-Time Data.
    Ma J; Xie H; Song K; Liu H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33418987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The driver's instantaneous situation awareness when the alarm rings during the take-over of vehicle control in automated driving.
    Niu J; Zhang Z; Sun Y; Wang X; Ni J; Qin H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):478-482. PubMed ID: 36170041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an Autonomous Driving Vehicle for Garbage Collection in Residential Areas.
    Pyo JW; Bae SH; Joo SH; Lee MK; Ghosh A; Kuc TY
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36501795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting driver's takeover time based on individual characteristics, external environment, and situation awareness.
    Chen H; Zhao X; Li H; Gong J; Fu Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107601. PubMed ID: 38718664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of age, speed and duration of monotonous driving task in traffic on the driver's useful visual field.
    Rogé J; Pébayle T; Lambilliotte E; Spitzenstetter F; Giselbrecht D; Muzet A
    Vision Res; 2004 Oct; 44(23):2737-44. PubMed ID: 15358068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dynamical traffic flow model for a cognitive drivers' sensitivity in Lagrangian scope.
    Hossain MA; Tanimoto J
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17341. PubMed ID: 36243824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of resolving uncertainty in driver's decision making.
    Callan AM; Osu R; Yamagishi Y; Callan DE; Inoue N
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2804-12. PubMed ID: 19117274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of Driver's Danger Level when Accessing the Center Console for Safe Driving.
    Lee HS; Oh S; Jo D; Kang BY
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30309040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DRER: Deep Learning-Based Driver's Real Emotion Recognizer.
    Oh G; Ryu J; Jeong E; Yang JH; Hwang S; Lee S; Lim S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(6):. PubMed ID: 33808922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A proactive lane-changing risk prediction framework considering driving intention recognition and different lane-changing patterns.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Wang J; Fang S; Fu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106500. PubMed ID: 34823098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Real-Time Recognition System of Driving Propensity Based on AutoNavi Navigation Data.
    Wang X; Chen L; Shi H; Han J; Wang G; Wang Q; Zhong F; Li H
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.