374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34528107)
1. The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.
Yi C; Tang Y; Ouyang R; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yang Z; Wu S; Han M; Xiao J; Chang P; Ma J
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1528-1537. PubMed ID: 34528107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?
Mansour S; Kamal R; Hashem L; AlKalaawy B
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210820. PubMed ID: 34613796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Depiction of breast cancers on digital mammograms by artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis according to cancer characteristics.
Lee SE; Han K; Yoon JH; Youk JH; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7400-7408. PubMed ID: 35499564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography.
Dang LA; Chazard E; Poncelet E; Serb T; Rusu A; Pauwels X; Parsy C; Poclet T; Cauliez H; Engelaere C; Ramette G; Brienne C; Dujardin S; Laurent N
Breast Cancer; 2022 Nov; 29(6):967-977. PubMed ID: 35763243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AI-CAD for differentiating lesions presenting as calcifications only on mammography: outcome analysis incorporating the ACR BI-RADS descriptors for calcifications.
Yoon J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6565-6574. PubMed ID: 35748900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?
Guldogan N; Taskin F; Icten GE; Yilmaz E; Turk EB; Erdemli S; Parlakkilic UT; Turkoglu O; Aribal E
Acad Radiol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38087719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.
Kim HE; Kim HH; Han BK; Kim KH; Han K; Nam H; Lee EH; Kim EK
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Mar; 2(3):e138-e148. PubMed ID: 33334578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of artificial intelligence in 7533 consecutive prevalent screening mammograms from the BreastScreen Australia program.
Waugh J; Evans J; Miocevic M; Lockie D; Aminzadeh P; Lynch A; Bell RJ
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3947-3957. PubMed ID: 37955669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective study of AI-assisted prediction of breast malignancies in physical health examinations: role of off-the-shelf AI software and comparison to radiologist performance.
Ma S; Li Y; Yin J; Niu Q; An Z; Du L; Li F; Gu J
Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1374278. PubMed ID: 38756651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Unnecessary Recalls at Screening Mammography: A Simulation Study.
Kim YS; Jang MJ; Lee SH; Kim SY; Ha SM; Kwon BR; Moon WK; Chang JM
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Dec; 23(12):1241-1250. PubMed ID: 36447412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial intelligence assistance for women who had spot compression view: reducing recall rates for digital mammography.
Lee SE; Kim GR; Yoon JH; Han K; Son WJ; Shin HJ; Moon HJ
Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1808-1815. PubMed ID: 36426409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader at screening mammography lowers recall rate but not the cancer detection rate and sensitivity at blinded and non-blinded double reading.
Klompenhouwer EG; Weber RJ; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; Broeders MJ; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 26117723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic Density Assessment by Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Comparison with Automated Volumetric Assessment.
Lee SE; Son NH; Kim MH; Kim EK
J Digit Imaging; 2022 Apr; 35(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 35015180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A bimodal nomogram as an adjunct tool to reduce unnecessary breast biopsy following discordant ultrasonic and mammographic BI-RADS assessment.
Xu Z; Lin Y; Huo J; Gao Y; Lu J; Liang Y; Li L; Jiang Z; Du L; Lang T; Wen G; Li Y
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2608-2618. PubMed ID: 37840099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
