382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34528107)
21. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Artificial intelligence for breast ultrasound: An adjunct tool to reduce excessive lesion biopsy.
Wang XY; Cui LG; Feng J; Chen W
Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109624. PubMed ID: 33706046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A.
Niu S; Huang J; Li J; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang R; Wang Y; Shen H; Qi M; Xiao Y; Guan M; Liu H; Li D; Liu F; Wang X; Xiong Y; Gao S; Wang X; Zhu J
BMC Cancer; 2020 Oct; 20(1):959. PubMed ID: 33008320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Using the BI-RADS lexicon in a restrictive form of double reading as a strategy for minimizing screening mammography recall rates.
Ghate SV; Baker JA; Kim CE; Johnson KS; Walsh R; Soo MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr; 198(4):962-70. PubMed ID: 22451567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study.
Lee JH; Kim KH; Lee EH; Ahn JS; Ryu JK; Park YM; Shin GW; Kim YJ; Choi HY
Korean J Radiol; 2022 May; 23(5):505-516. PubMed ID: 35434976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Possible strategies for use of artificial intelligence in screen-reading of mammograms, based on retrospective data from 122,969 screening examinations.
Larsen M; Aglen CF; Hoff SR; Lund-Hanssen H; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8238-8246. PubMed ID: 35704111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. AI for interpreting screening mammograms: implications for missed cancer in double reading practices and challenging-to-locate lesions.
Jiang Z; Gandomkar Z; Trieu PDY; Taba ST; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11893. PubMed ID: 38789575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surveillance of probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions in mammography: what is the right follow-up protocol?
Buch KA; Qureshi MM; Carpentier B; Cunningham DA; Stone M; Jaffe C; Quinn M; Gonzalez C; LaVoye J; Hines N; Bloch BN
Breast J; 2015; 21(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 25669425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Artificial Intelligence Applied to Breast MRI for Improved Diagnosis.
Jiang Y; Edwards AV; Newstead GM
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 33078996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The added value of digital breast tomosynthesis in improving diagnostic performance of BI-RADS categorization of mammographically indeterminate breast lesions.
Basha MAA; Safwat HK; Alaa Eldin AM; Dawoud HA; Hassanin AM
Insights Imaging; 2020 Feb; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 32060736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Performance of users in tropical areas with the BI-RADS classification of breast lesions for predicting malignancy].
Gonsu Kamga JE; Moifo B; Sando Z; Guegang Goudjou E; Nko'o Amvene S; Gonsu Fotsin J
Med Sante Trop; 2013; 23(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24334372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Travieso-Aja MM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System in Breast Ultrasound.
O'Connell AM; Bartolotta TV; Orlando A; Jung SH; Baek J; Parker KJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jan; 41(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 33665833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Mammography, Artificial Intelligence, and Supplementary Ultrasound.
Lee SE; Yoon JH; Son NH; Han K; Moon HJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329655. PubMed ID: 37493324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Determination of similarity measures for pairs of mass lesions on mammograms by use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors and image features.
Muramatsu C; Li Q; Schmidt RA; Shiraishi J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 19268856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Population-wide evaluation of artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment of screening mammograms.
Kühl J; Elhakim MT; Stougaard SW; Rasmussen BSB; Nielsen M; Gerke O; Larsen LB; Graumann O
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3935-3946. PubMed ID: 37938386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
