These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34529710)

  • 1. Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three-dimensional printing.
    Chou WT; Chuang CC; Wang YB; Chiu HC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257158. PubMed ID: 34529710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and internal fit of provisional crowns fabricated using 3D printing technology.
    Chaturvedi S; Alqahtani NM; Addas MK; Alfarsi MA
    Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):635-642. PubMed ID: 32280071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the accuracy of crown fitting between milling and 3D printing techniques using CAD/CAM technologies.
    Alhamoudi FH
    Technol Health Care; 2024; 32(4):2755-2768. PubMed ID: 38820032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Quintessence Int; 2018; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of margin discrepancy of complete gold crowns fabricated using printed, milled, and conventional hand-waxed patterns.
    Munoz S; Ramos V; Dickinson DP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 27866698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal fit of 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: Influence of pattern fabrication method and repeated porcelain firings.
    Giti R; Farrahi P
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301799. PubMed ID: 38625846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Internal Fit and Marginal Adaptation of Provisional Crowns Fabricated with Three Different Techniques.
    Wu J; Xie H; Sadr A; Chung KH
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33499198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of internal fit of interim crown fabricated with CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing system.
    Lee WS; Lee DH; Lee KB
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):265-270. PubMed ID: 28874993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing.
    Mai HN; Lee KB; Lee DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Aug; 118(2):208-215. PubMed ID: 28089333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
    Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the accuracy of resin-composite crowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and milling methods.
    Kakinuma H; Izumita K; Yoda N; Egusa H; Sasaki K
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Nov; 41(6):808-815. PubMed ID: 35793943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology.
    Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated by using a casting and two selective laser melting processes before and after ceramic firing.
    Hong MH; Min BK; Lee DH; Kwon TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):475-481. PubMed ID: 30982615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
    Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Internal Adaptations of Crowns Cast from Resin Patterns Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing Technologies.
    Liu Y; Ye H; Wang Y; Zhao Y; Sun Y; Zhou Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(4):386–393. PubMed ID: 29772034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
    Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.