These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34532314)

  • 1. Subject-Specific Alignment and Mass Distribution in Musculoskeletal Models of the Lumbar Spine.
    Fasser MR; Jokeit M; Kalthoff M; Gomez Romero DA; Trache T; Snedeker JG; Farshad M; Widmer J
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():721042. PubMed ID: 34532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of a modeling workflow for the generation of image-based, subject-specific thoracolumbar models of spinal deformity.
    Overbergh T; Severijns P; Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Jonkers I; Moke L; Scheys L
    J Biomech; 2020 Sep; 110():109946. PubMed ID: 32827766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semiautomated 3D Spine Reconstruction from Biplanar Radiographic Images: Prediction of Intervertebral Loading in Scoliotic Subjects.
    Bassani T; Ottardi C; Costa F; Brayda-Bruno M; Wilke HJ; Galbusera F
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2017; 5():1. PubMed ID: 28164082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thoracolumbar spine model with articulated ribcage for the prediction of dynamic spinal loading.
    Ignasiak D; Dendorfer S; Ferguson SJ
    J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):959-966. PubMed ID: 26684431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a Patient-Specific Musculoskeletal Model for Lumbar Load Estimation Generated by an Automated Pipeline From Whole Body CT.
    Lerchl T; El Husseini M; Bayat A; Sekuboyina A; Hermann L; Nispel K; Baum T; Löffler MT; Senner V; Kirschke JS
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():862804. PubMed ID: 35898642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fusion angle affects intervertebral adjacent spinal segment joint forces-Model-based analysis of patient specific alignment.
    Senteler M; Weisse B; Rothenfluh DA; Farshad MT; Snedeker JG
    J Orthop Res; 2017 Jan; 35(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 27364167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.
    Schmid S; Burkhart KA; Allaire BT; Grindle D; Anderson DE
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109305. PubMed ID: 31471110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dependence of lumbar loads on spinopelvic sagittal alignment: An evaluation based on musculoskeletal modeling.
    Bassani T; Casaroli G; Galbusera F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0207997. PubMed ID: 30883563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A rigid thorax assumption affects model loading predictions at the upper but not lower lumbar levels.
    Ignasiak D; Ferguson SJ; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):3074-3078. PubMed ID: 27515441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity of musculoskeletal model-based lumbar spinal loading estimates to type of kinematic input and passive stiffness properties.
    Byrne RM; Aiyangar AK; Zhang X
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109659. PubMed ID: 32070482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thoracolumbar spine loading associated with kinematics of the young and the elderly during activities of daily living.
    Ignasiak D; Rüeger A; Sperr R; Ferguson SJ
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():175-184. PubMed ID: 29248192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subject-specific 2D/3D image registration and kinematics-driven musculoskeletal model of the spine.
    Eskandari AH; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Farahmand F
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 57():18-26. PubMed ID: 28365064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporation of CT-based measurements of trunk anatomy into subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the spine influences vertebral loading predictions.
    Bruno AG; Mokhtarzadeh H; Allaire BT; Velie KR; De Paolis Kaluza MC; Anderson DE; Bouxsein ML
    J Orthop Res; 2017 Oct; 35(10):2164-2173. PubMed ID: 28092118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multibody Models of the Thoracolumbar Spine: A Review on Applications, Limitations, and Challenges.
    Lerchl T; Nispel K; Baum T; Bodden J; Senner V; Kirschke JS
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 36829696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of Cervical Spinal Joint Loading and Secondary Motion Using a Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Model Via Force-Dependent Kinematics Approach.
    Diao H; Xin H; Dong J; He X; Li D; Jin Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1403-E1409. PubMed ID: 28368985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of physiological functional spinal units in a rigid-body model of the thoracolumbar spine.
    Wang W; Wang D; De Groote F; Scheys L; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109437. PubMed ID: 31679758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating lumbar passive stiffness behaviour from subject-specific finite element models and in vivo 6DOF kinematics.
    Affolter C; Kedzierska J; Vielma T; Weisse B; Aiyangar A
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109681. PubMed ID: 32151379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multibody modelling approach to determine load sharing between passive elements of the lumbar spine.
    Abouhossein A; Weisse B; Ferguson SJ
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Jun; 14(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 21128134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of lumbar spine loading from a musculoskeletal model including the lower limbs and lumbar spine.
    Actis JA; Honegger JD; Gates DH; Petrella AJ; Nolasco LA; Silverman AK
    J Biomech; 2018 Feb; 68():107-114. PubMed ID: 29310946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spinal Loading Patterns From Biomechanical Modeling Explain the High Incidence of Vertebral Fractures in the Thoracolumbar Region.
    Bruno AG; Burkhart K; Allaire B; Anderson DE; Bouxsein ML
    J Bone Miner Res; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1282-1290. PubMed ID: 28244135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.