These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34532617)

  • 1. Independent External Validation of FRAX and Garvan Fracture Risk Calculators: A Sub-Study of the FRISBEE Cohort.
    Baleanu F; Iconaru L; Charles A; Kinnard V; Fils JF; Moreau M; Karmali R; Surquin M; Benoit F; Mugisha A; Paesmans M; Laurent MR; Bergmann P; Body JJ
    JBMR Plus; 2021 Sep; 5(9):e10532. PubMed ID: 34532617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older women.
    Bolland MJ; Siu AT; Mason BH; Horne AM; Ames RW; Grey AB; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Feb; 26(2):420-7. PubMed ID: 20721930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting Fracture Risk in Younger Postmenopausal Women: Comparison of the Garvan and FRAX Risk Calculators in the Women's Health Initiative Study.
    Crandall CJ; Larson J; LaCroix A; Cauley JA; LeBoff MS; Li W; LeBlanc ES; Edwards BJ; Manson JE; Ensrud K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 34(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 30334182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hip Fracture Risk Assessment Tools for Adults Aged 80 Years and Older.
    Ensrud KE; Schousboe JT; Crandall CJ; Leslie WD; Fink HA; Cawthon PM; Kado DM; Lane NE; Cauley JA; Langsetmo L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jun; 7(6):e2418612. PubMed ID: 38941095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal fracture prediction thresholds for therapy onset, established from FRAX and Garvan algorithms: a longitudinal observation of the population representative female cohort from the RAC-OST-POL Study.
    Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2023 Nov; 18(1):136. PubMed ID: 37973685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
    Beaudoin C; Moore L; Gagné M; Bessette L; Ste-Marie LG; Brown JP; Jean S
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30877348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram.
    Sandhu SK; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Pocock NA; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 May; 21(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 19633880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
    Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reasons for discrepancies in hip fracture risk estimates using FRAX and Garvan calculators.
    Billington EO; Gamble GD; Reid IR
    Maturitas; 2016 Mar; 85():11-8. PubMed ID: 26857874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture risk prediction in postmenopausal women from GO Study: the comparison between FRAX, Garvan, and POL-RISK algorithms.
    Pluskiewicz W; Werner A; Bach M; Adamczyk P; Drozdzowska B
    Arch Osteoporos; 2024 May; 19(1):39. PubMed ID: 38755326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. External validation of FRISBEE 5-year fracture prediction models: a registry-based cohort study.
    Agarwal A; Baleanu F; Moreau M; Charles A; Iconaru L; Surquin M; Benoit F; Paesmans M; Karmali R; Bergmann P; Body JJ; Leslie WD
    Arch Osteoporos; 2022 Dec; 18(1):13. PubMed ID: 36564674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fracture risk assessment tools in older men without prior hip or spine fracture: the MrOS study.
    Gourlay ML; Ritter VS; Fine JP; Overman RA; Schousboe JT; Cawthon PM; Orwoll ES; Nguyen TV; Lane NE; Cummings SR; Kado DM; Lapidus JA; Diem SJ; Ensrud KE;
    Arch Osteoporos; 2017 Oct; 12(1):91. PubMed ID: 29052793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of Fracture Risk Assessment Tools by Race and Ethnicity: A Systematic Review for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk.
    Fink HA; Butler ME; Claussen AM; Collins ES; Krohn KM; Taylor BC; Tikabo SS; Vang D; Zerzan NL; Ensrud KE
    J Bone Miner Res; 2023 Dec; 38(12):1731-1741. PubMed ID: 37597237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FRAX calculator and Garvan nomogram in male osteoporotic population.
    Pluskiewicz W; Adamczyk P; Franek E; Sewerynek E; Leszczynski P; Wichrowska H; Napiórkowska L; Stuss M; Ptaszek A; Kostyk T; Golba KS; Garbacz W; Drozdzowska B
    Aging Male; 2014 Sep; 17(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 24456527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.
    Azagra R; Zwart M; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Martin-Sánchez JC; Puchol-Ruiz N; Gabriel-Escoda P; Ortiz-Alinque S; Gené E; Iglesias M; Moriña D; Diaz-Herrera MA; Utzet M; Manresa JM;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jun; 17():262. PubMed ID: 27317560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fragility Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: Development of 5-Year Prediction Models Using the FRISBEE Study.
    Baleanu F; Moreau M; Charles A; Iconaru L; Karmali R; Surquin M; Benoit F; Mugisha A; Paesmans M; Rubinstein M; Rozenberg S; Bergmann P; Body JJ
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2022 May; 107(6):e2438-e2448. PubMed ID: 35176768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of fracture risk calculators in elderly fallers: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.
    Todorov G; Brook S; Quah Qin Xian N; Von Widekind S; Freudenthal B; Comninos AN
    BMJ Open; 2022 Jul; 12(7):e060282. PubMed ID: 35820750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of an Imminent Fracture After an Index Fracture - Models Derived From the Frisbee Cohort.
    Iconaru L; Charles A; Baleanu F; Surquin M; Benoit F; Mugisha A; Moreau M; Paesmans M; Karmali R; Rubinstein M; Rozenberg S; Body JJ; Bergmann P
    J Bone Miner Res; 2022 Jan; 37(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 34490908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
    J Bone Miner Res; 2010 Nov; 25(11):2350-8. PubMed ID: 20499367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.