These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34533231)

  • 1. Computer monitor pixellation and Landolt C visual acuity.
    Carkeet A; Lister L; Goh YT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 34533231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
    Heinrich SP; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of visual acuity measurement with Landolt rings versus numbers].
    Rohrschneider K; Spittler AR; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2019 Nov; 116(11):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 30927070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity.
    Bach M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jan; 73(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8867682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering.
    Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [How should visual acuity be measured?].
    Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1996 Jul; 52(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 8768473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A near-vision chart for children aged 3-5 years old: new designs and clinical applications.
    Huang YQ; Huang H; Huang RZ
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2014; 7(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 24967191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [New DIN and ISO norms for determination of visual acuity].
    Wesemann W; Heinrich SP; Jägle H; Schiefer U; Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 2020 Jan; 117(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 31346702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The FreiBurger: a new optotype for P300-based acuity estimation.
    Duval CZ; Kaczan SB; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38916779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
    Becker R; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Event-Related Potentials Allow for Optotype-Based Objective Acuity Estimation.
    Heinrich SP; Lüth I; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2184-91. PubMed ID: 25744983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The Freiburg Vision Test. Automated determination of visual acuity].
    Bach M
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 7780276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.