These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34533661)

  • 1. Effect of marker dosage frequency and spot fecal sampling frequency in the prediction accuracy of fecal output using chromic oxide and titanium dioxide in grazing BON steers.
    Silva S JC; Correa L GA; Mayorga M OL; Duran C EN; Portilla P D; Diaz T FA; Granja-Salcedo YT; Valencia E DM
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2021 Sep; 53(5):448. PubMed ID: 34533661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of titanium dioxide and chromic oxide as digestibility markers in ponies fed alfalfa hay in relation to marker dosing frequency.
    Schaafstra FJWC; van Doorn DA; Schonewille JT; van den Boom R; Verschuur M; Blok MC; Hendriks WH
    Animal; 2019 Apr; 13(4):702-708. PubMed ID: 30175695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to measure apparent total tract digestibility in beef cattle and sheep.
    Hoffmann CA; Sarturi JO; Weindorf DC; Henry DD; Ramirez-Ramirez HA; Jackson S; Ballou MA; Sandes MD; Bouyi L
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Mar; 98(3):. PubMed ID: 32052008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of titanium dioxide as a digestibility marker for cattle.
    Titgemeyer EC; Armendariz CK; Bindel DJ; Greenwood RH; Löest CA
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):1059-63. PubMed ID: 11325180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy on feces to estimate digestibility and dry matter intake of dietary nutritional characteristics under grazing conditions in Colombian creole steers.
    Parra-Forero D; Valencia-Echavarría DM; Mestra-Vargas LI; Gualdrón-Duarte L; Sierra-Alarcón AM; Mayorga-Mogollón O; Ariza-Nieto C
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2023 Apr; 55(3):178. PubMed ID: 37119301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of four digestibility markers to estimate fecal output of dogs.
    Alvarenga IC; Aldrich CG; Ou Z
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 30753619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Additivity of apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acid determined by chromic oxide and titanium dioxide in mixed diets containing wheat and multiple protein sources fed to growing pigs.
    Wang T; Osho SO; Adeola O
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4731-4742. PubMed ID: 30107589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of external markers to estimate fecal excretion, intake, and digestibility in dairy cows.
    de Souza J; Batistel F; Welter KC; Silva MM; Costa DF; Portela Santos FA
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2015 Jan; 47(1):265-8. PubMed ID: 25245114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of different levels of concentrate and ruminally undegraded protein on digestive variables in beef heifers.
    Pina DS; Valadares Filho SC; Tedeschi LO; Barbosa AM; Valadares RF
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Mar; 87(3):1058-67. PubMed ID: 18997071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical note: using an automated head chamber system to administer an external marker to estimate fecal output by grazing beef cattle.
    Beck MR; Gunter SA; Moffet CA; Reuter RR
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34383906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating internal and external markers versus fecal sampling procedure interactions when estimating intake in dairy cows consuming a corn silage-based diet.
    Velásquez AV; da Silva GG; Sousa DO; Oliveira CA; Martins CMMR; Dos Santos PPM; Balieiro JCC; Rennó FP; Fukushima RS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jul; 101(7):5890-5901. PubMed ID: 29680654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ytterbium chloride and chromium sesquioxide as fecal indicators.
    Prigge EC; Varga GA; Vicini JL; Reid RL
    J Anim Sci; 1981 Dec; 53(6):1629-33. PubMed ID: 7200483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of methods for estimating forage intake, digestibility, and fecal output in red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Garrett K; Beck MR; Froehlich K; Fleming A; Thompson BR; Stevens DR; Gregorini P
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Mar; 98(3):. PubMed ID: 32115639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of wet corn gluten feed and intake level on diet digestibility and ruminal passage rate in steers.
    Montgomery SP; Drouillard JS; Titgemeyer EC; Sindt JJ; Farran TB; Pike JN; Coetzer CM; Trater AM; Higgins JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Dec; 82(12):3526-36. PubMed ID: 15537773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. At least 3 days of adaptation are required before indigestible markers (chromium, titanium, and acid insoluble ash) are stabilized in the ileal digesta of 60-kg pigs, but values for amino acid digestibility are affected by the marker.
    Kim BG; Lee SA; Park KR; Stein HH
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Feb; 98(2):. PubMed ID: 31999323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dietary marker effects on fecal microbial ecology, fecal VFA, nutrient digestibility coefficients, and growth performance in finishing pigs.
    Kerr BJ; Weber TE; Ziemer CJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2183-90. PubMed ID: 26020314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product in receiving diets of newly weaned beef steers. II. Digestibility and response to a vaccination challenge1.
    Deters EL; Stokes RS; Genther-Schroeder ON; Hansen SL
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(9):3906-3915. PubMed ID: 29912356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of feed intake fluctuation and frequency of feeding on nutrient digestion, digesta kinetics, and ruminal fermentation profiles in limit-fed steers.
    Soto-Navarro SA; Krehbiel CR; Duff GC; Galyean ML; Brown MS; Steiner RL
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Aug; 78(8):2215-22. PubMed ID: 10947111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of supplement type on animal performance, forage intake, digestion, and ruminal measurements of growing beef cattle.
    Bodine TN; Purvis HT; Lalman DL
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Apr; 79(4):1041-51. PubMed ID: 11325178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of supplemental energy and/or degradable intake protein on performance, grazing behavior, intake, digestibility, and fecal and blood indices by beef steers grazed on dormant native tallgrass prairie.
    Bodine TN; Purvis HT
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jan; 81(1):304-17. PubMed ID: 12597402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.