BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34534241)

  • 1. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
    Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
    Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
    Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
    Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compound and Conditioned Likelihood Ratio Behavior within a Probabilistic Genotyping Context.
    Duke K; Cuenca D; Myers S; Wallin J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36360267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STRmix
    Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNAxs/DNAStatistX: Development and validation of a software suite for the data management and probabilistic interpretation of DNA profiles.
    Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Hovers P; Slagter M; Kruise D; Parag R; Steensma K; Slooten K; Nagel JHA; Dieltjes P; van Marion V; van Paassen H; de Jong J; Creeten C; Sijen T; Kneppers ALJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():81-89. PubMed ID: 31254947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.
    Bright JA; Cheng K; Kerr Z; McGovern C; Kelly H; Moretti TR; Smith MA; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Coble MD; Alghafri R; Allen PS; Barber A; Beamer V; Buettner C; Russell M; Gehrig C; Hicks T; Charak J; Cheong-Wing K; Ciecko A; Davis CT; Donley M; Pedersen N; Gartside B; Granger D; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Reisinger E; Kennedy J; Grammer E; Kaplan M; Hansen D; Larsen HJ; Laureano A; Li C; Lien E; Lindberg E; Kelly C; Mallinder B; Malsom S; Yacovone-Margetts A; McWhorter A; Prajapati SM; Powell T; Shutler G; Stevenson K; Stonehouse AR; Smith L; Murakami J; Halsing E; Wright D; Clark L; Taylor DA; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():1-8. PubMed ID: 30665115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring likelihood ratios assigned for siblings of the true mixture contributor as an alternate contributor.
    Kelly H; Coble M; Kruijver M; Wivell R; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1167-1175. PubMed ID: 35211970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of Kongoh ver. 3.0.1: Open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation in the GlobalFiler system based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Fukagawa T; Fujii K; Mizuno N; Sekiguchi K; Akane A; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2022 Feb; 54():101972. PubMed ID: 34629243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples.
    Alladio E; Omedei M; Cisana S; D'Amico G; Caneparo D; Vincenti M; Garofano P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():143-150. PubMed ID: 30173123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
    Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-laboratory validation of DNAxs including the statistical library DNAStatistX.
    Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Bargeman F; Hovers P; Slagter M; van der Linden J; Parag R; Kruise D; Drobnic K; Klucevsek G; Parson W; Berger B; Laurent FX; Faivre M; Ulus A; Schneider P; Bogus M; Kneppers ALJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102390. PubMed ID: 32937255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0247344. PubMed ID: 34653182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.