These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34534241)
21. An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories. Boodoosingh S; Kelly H; Curran JM; Kalafut T Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103046. PubMed ID: 38598920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures. Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST. Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures. Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model. Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping. McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles. Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A tale of two PG systems: A comparison of the two most widely used continuous probabilistic genotyping systems in the United States. Greenspoon SA; Schiermeier-Wood L; Jenkins BC J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38899548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors. Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis. Huffman K; Ballantyne J Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview. Coble MD; Bright JA Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching. Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts. Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors. Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of STRmix™ with respect to laboratory calibration. Kelly H; Bright JA; Kruijver M; Cooper S; Taylor D; Duke K; Strong M; Beamer V; Buettner C; Buckleton J Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():113-122. PubMed ID: 29727813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA. Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Probabilistic interpretation of the Amelogenin locus. Bright JA; Buckleton J; Taylor D Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102462. PubMed ID: 33465757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Re: Riman et al. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset. Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Wivell R; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Benschop C; Budowle B; Coble M Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102709. PubMed ID: 35459634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]