These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34534241)

  • 41. EFMrep: An extension of EuroForMix for improved combination of STR DNA mixture profiles.
    Bleka Ø; Prieto L; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102771. PubMed ID: 36075175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sibling assessment based on likelihood ratio and total number of shared alleles using 21 short tandem repeat loci included in the GlobalFiler™ kit.
    Inoue H; Manabe S; Fujii K; Iwashima Y; Miyama S; Tanaka A; Saitoh H; Iwase H; Tamaki K; Sekiguchi K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Mar; 19():122-6. PubMed ID: 26254055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Two-person DNA mixture interpretation based on a novel set of SNP-STR markers.
    Tan Y; Bai P; Wang L; Wang H; Tian H; Jian H; Zhang R; Liu Y; Liang W; Zhang L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():37-45. PubMed ID: 30075395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Searching CODIS with binary conversions of STRmix interpretations.
    Myers S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102569. PubMed ID: 34428671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Testing likelihood ratios produced from complex DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Buckleton J; Evett I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():165-171. PubMed ID: 25621923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An examination of STR nomenclatures, filters and models for MPS mixture interpretation.
    Bleka Ø; Just R; Le J; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102319. PubMed ID: 32563046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
    Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
    Foley MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
    Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
    Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Combining artificial neural network classification with fully continuous probabilistic genotyping to remove the need for an analytical threshold and electropherogram reading.
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jan; 62():102787. PubMed ID: 36270165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
    Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
    Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Are low LRs reliable?
    Buckleton JS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kruijver M; Gill P; Budowle B; Cheng K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102350. PubMed ID: 32979624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
    Thompson WC
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Single-cell investigative genetics: Single-cell data produces genotype distributions concentrated at the true genotype across all mixture complexities.
    Grgicak CM; Bhembe Q; Slooten K; Sheth NC; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103000. PubMed ID: 38199167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.