These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34534241)

  • 61. Identifying the most likely contributors to a Y-STR mixture using the discrete Laplace method.
    Andersen MM; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Mar; 15():76-83. PubMed ID: 25303788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Open source software EuroForMix can be used to analyse complex SNP mixtures.
    Bleka Ø; Eduardoff M; Santos C; Phillips C; Parson W; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():105-110. PubMed ID: 28942111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A tool for simulating single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102746. PubMed ID: 35843122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Carrying out common DNA donor analysis using DBLR™ on two or five-cell mini-mixture subsamples for improved discrimination power in complex DNA mixtures.
    Huffman K; Kruijver M; Ballantyne J; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102908. PubMed ID: 37402330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. CaseSolver: An investigative open source expert system based on EuroForMix.
    Bleka Ø; Prieto L; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():83-92. PubMed ID: 31031230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
    Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Massively parallel sequencing analysis of nondegraded and degraded DNA mixtures using the ForenSeq™ system in combination with EuroForMix software.
    Hwa HL; Wu MY; Chung WC; Ko TM; Lin CP; Yin HI; Lee TT; Lee JC
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Jan; 133(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 30374565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
    Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles.
    Bleka Ø; Benschop CCG; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():85-96. PubMed ID: 27529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Allele frequencies and minor contributor match statistic convergence using simulated population replicates.
    Novroski NMM; Moo-Choy A; Wendt FR
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Sep; 136(5):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 35396663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour.
    Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():144-53. PubMed ID: 24727432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evidentiary evaluation of single cells renders highly informative forensic comparisons across multifarious admixtures.
    Duffy KR; Lun DS; Mulcahy MM; O'Donnell L; Sheth N; Grgicak CM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102852. PubMed ID: 36934551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.
    Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():82-9. PubMed ID: 25082140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Exploring how the LR of a POI in a target sample is impacted by awareness of the profile of the background derived from an area adjacent to the target sample.
    Reither JB; Taylor D; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102868. PubMed ID: 37001465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
    Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The information gain from peak height data in DNA mixtures.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():119-123. PubMed ID: 29990823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Exploring the probative value of mixed DNA profiles.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():1-10. PubMed ID: 30913444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.