236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34534404)
1. Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Alkmark M; Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Bergh C; Carlsson Y; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Hagberg H; Svensson M
BJOG; 2022 Dec; 129(13):2157-2165. PubMed ID: 34534404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Planned birth at or near term for improving health outcomes for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and their infants.
Biesty LM; Egan AM; Dunne F; Dempsey E; Meskell P; Smith V; Ni Bhuinneain GM; Devane D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD012910. PubMed ID: 29303230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks.
Elden H; Hagberg H; Wessberg A; Sengpiel V; Herbst A; Bullarbo M; Bergh C; Bolin K; Malbasic S; Saltvedt S; Stephansson O; Wikström AK; Ladfors L; Wennerholm UB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():49. PubMed ID: 26951777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hersh AR; Skeith AE; Sargent JA; Caughey AB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):590.e1-590.e10. PubMed ID: 30768934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An economic evaluation of planned immediate versus delayed birth for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes: findings from the PPROMT randomised controlled trial.
Lain SJ; Roberts CL; Bond DM; Smith J; Morris JM
BJOG; 2017 Mar; 124(4):623-630. PubMed ID: 27770483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic analysis comparing induction of labour and expectant management for intrauterine growth restriction at term (DIGITAT trial).
Vijgen SM; Boers KE; Opmeer BC; Bijlenga D; Bekedam DJ; Bloemenkamp KW; de Boer K; Bremer HA; le Cessie S; Delemarre FM; Duvekot JJ; Hasaart TH; Kwee A; van Lith JM; van Meir CA; van Pampus MG; van der Post JA; Rijken M; Roumen FJ; van der Salm PC; Spaanderman ME; Willekes C; Wijnen EJ; Mol BW; Scherjon SA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 23910171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome.
Bond DM; Middleton P; Levett KM; van der Ham DP; Crowther CA; Buchanan SL; Morris J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 3(3):CD004735. PubMed ID: 28257562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Alkmark M; Keulen JKJ; Kortekaas JC; Bergh C; van Dillen J; Duijnhoven RG; Hagberg H; Mol BW; Molin M; van der Post JAM; Saltvedt S; Wikström AK; Wennerholm UB; de Miranda E
PLoS Med; 2020 Dec; 17(12):e1003436. PubMed ID: 33290410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of induction of labour at 41 weeks and expectant management until 42 weeks in low risk women (INDEX trial).
Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Eekelen R; van Wely M; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van de Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Mar; 17():100178. PubMed ID: 36755905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Labour induction near term for women aged 35 or over: an economic evaluation.
Walker KF; Dritsaki M; Bugg G; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Grace N; Wildsmith C; Bradshaw L; Smith G; Thornton JG
BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):929-934. PubMed ID: 28075507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of induction of labor at 39 weeks vs expectant management by cervical examination.
Fitzgerald AC; Kaimal AJ; Little SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Aug; 229(2):162.e1-162.e9. PubMed ID: 36642340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Likelihood of primary cesarean section following induction of labor in singleton cephalic pregnancies at term, compared with expectant management: An Australian population-based, historical cohort study.
Hu Y; Homer CSE; Ellwood D; Slavin V; Vogel JP; Enticott J; Callander EJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 May; 103(5):946-954. PubMed ID: 38291953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.
Zhao Y; Flatley C; Kumar S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Feb; 57(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 28251626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour versus expectant management for nulliparous women over 35 years of age: a multi-centre prospective, randomised controlled trial.
Walker KF; Bugg G; Macpherson M; McCormick C; Wildsmith C; Smith G; Thornton J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():145. PubMed ID: 23231750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of induction of labour versus expectant management in women with impending post-term pregnancies: the 41 week - 42 week dilemma.
Kortekaas JC; Bruinsma A; Keulen JK; van Dillen J; Oudijk MA; Zwart JJ; Bakker JJ; de Bont D; Nieuwenhuijze M; Offerhaus PM; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche F; Mol BW; de Miranda E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Oct; 14():350. PubMed ID: 25338555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
