These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34534792)

  • 1. Which bidomain conductivity is the most important for modelling heart and torso surface potentials during ischaemia?
    Johnston BM; Johnston PR
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Oct; 137():104830. PubMed ID: 34534792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the effect of uncertainty in input parameters in a simplified bidomain model of partial thickness ischaemia.
    Johnston BM; Coveney S; Chang ETY; Johnston PR; Clayton RH
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 May; 56(5):761-780. PubMed ID: 28933043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity analysis of ST-segment epicardial potentials arising from changes in ischaemic region conductivities in early and late stage ischaemia.
    Johnston BM; Johnston PR
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():288-299. PubMed ID: 29914695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of conductivity on ST-segment epicardial potentials arising from subendocardial ischemia.
    Hopenfeld B; Stinstra JG; MacLeod RS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 33(6):751-63. PubMed ID: 16078615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A sensitivity study of conductivity values in the passive bidomain equation.
    Johnston PR
    Math Biosci; 2011 Aug; 232(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 21624377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six Conductivity Values to Use in the Bidomain Model of Cardiac Tissue.
    Johnston BM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jul; 63(7):1525-31. PubMed ID: 26560866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approaches for determining cardiac bidomain conductivity values: progress and challenges.
    Johnston BM; Johnston PR
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Dec; 58(12):2919-2935. PubMed ID: 33089458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cylindrical model for studying subendocardial ischaemia in the left ventricle.
    Johnston PR
    Math Biosci; 2003 Nov; 186(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 14527746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of conductivity values on ST segment shift in subendocardial ischaemia.
    Johnston PR; Kilpatrick D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 12665028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of simplifying assumptions in the bidomain model of cardiac tissue: application to ST segment shifts during partial ischaemia.
    Johnston PR
    Math Biosci; 2005 Nov; 198(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 16061262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How ischaemic region shape affects ST potentials in models of cardiac tissue.
    Barnes JP; Johnston PR
    Math Biosci; 2012 Oct; 239(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 22698893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nondimensional formulation of the passive bidomain equation.
    Johnston PR
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 21255793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multi-electrode array and inversion technique for retrieving six conductivities from heart potential measurements.
    Johnston BM; Johnston PR
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1295-303. PubMed ID: 23892890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling passive cardiac conductivity during ischaemia.
    Stinstra JG; Shome S; Hopenfeld B; MacLeod RS
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Nov; 43(6):776-82. PubMed ID: 16594306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the most significant input parameters in models of subendocardial ischaemia and their effect on ST segment epicardial potential distributions.
    Johnston BM; Johnston PR
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Apr; 95():75-89. PubMed ID: 29459293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of cardiac bidomain parameters from extracellular measurement: two dimensional study.
    Sadleir R; Henriquez C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 34(8):1289-303. PubMed ID: 16804743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A modified approach to determine the six cardiac bidomain conductivities.
    Kamalakkannan A; Johnston PR; Johnston BM
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104549. PubMed ID: 34171640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of the bidomain conductivity parameters of cardiac tissue from extracellular potential distributions initiated by point stimulation.
    Graham LS; Kilpatrick D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Dec; 38(12):3630-48. PubMed ID: 20628818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences between models of partial thickness and subendocardial ischaemia in terms of sensitivity analyses of ST-segment epicardial potential distributions.
    Johnston BM; Johnston PR
    Math Biosci; 2019 Dec; 318():108273. PubMed ID: 31647934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representing cardiac bidomain bath-loading effects by an augmented monodomain approach: application to complex ventricular models.
    Bishop MJ; Plank G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Apr; 58(4):1066-75. PubMed ID: 21292591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.