137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34536801)
1. Hydrothermal aging affects the three-dimensional fit and fatigue lifetime of zirconia abutments.
Bergamo ETP; Campos TMB; Lopes ACO; Cardoso KB; Gouvea MVR; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Witek L; Gierthmühlen PC; Coelho PG; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Zahoui A; de Carvalho LF; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104832. PubMed ID: 34536801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-abutment fit influences the mechanical performance of single-crown prostheses.
Ramalho IS; Bergamo ETP; Witek L; Coelho PG; Lopes ACO; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Feb; 102():103506. PubMed ID: 31877515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue resistance and fracture strength of narrow-diameter one-piece zirconia implants with angled abutments.
Atalay P; Öztaş DD
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Oct; 34(7):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 35855644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments.
Canullo L; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23559107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure Modes and Survival of Anterior Crowns Supported by Narrow Implant Systems.
Bergamo ETP; de Araújo-Júnior ENS; Lopes ACO; Coelho PG; Zahoui A; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Bonfante EA
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():1057846. PubMed ID: 32964016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical stability of angulated zirconia abutments supporting maxillary anterior single crowns on narrow-diameter implants.
Ma R; Yu P; Zhang Y; Xie C; Tan X; Sun J; Yu H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 36161530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Screw Channel Angulation on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Garcia-Hammaker S; Saglik B; Sierraalta M; Razzoog M
J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):329-334. PubMed ID: 33170540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of straight versus angulated screw channel titanium bases on failure loads of two-piece ceramic and titanium implants restored with screw-retained monolithic crowns: An in-vitro study.
Helal E; Gierthmuehlen PC; Bonfante EA; Campos TMB; Prott LS; Langner R; Spitznagel FA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1217-1229. PubMed ID: 37565379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.
Yüksel M; Saygin AG; Bolayir G
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):594-601. PubMed ID: 36065985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Thulasidas S; Givan DA; Lemons JE; O'Neal SJ; Ramp LC; Liu PR
J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 24975560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant deformation and implant-abutment fracture resistance after standardized artificial aging: An in vitro study.
Zhai Z; Nakano T; Chen Y; Watanabe S; Matsuoka T; Ishigaki S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 36415012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs.
Sen N; Us YO
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 31326150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture Resistance of Straight and Angulated Zirconia Implant Abutments Supporting Anterior Three-Unit Lithium Disilicate Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Saker S; El-Shahat S; Ghazy M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 27861648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Cárdenas R; Sánchez D; Euán R; Flores AM
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
