181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34538538)
1. Relapse-related factors of Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Valls-Ontañón A; Fernandes-Ciaccia L; Haas-Junior OL; Hernández-Alfaro F
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 49(10):879-890. PubMed ID: 34538538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relapse rate after surgical treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in non-growing cleft patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jiang L; Zheng Y; Li N; Chen X; Lu Z; Tong H; Yin N; Song T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(4):421-431. PubMed ID: 31526673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery for cleft lip and palate patients.
Kloukos D; Fudalej P; Sequeira-Byron P; Katsaros C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD010403. PubMed ID: 30095853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of anterior maxillary distraction compared to LeFort-1 osteotomy and total maxillary distraction osteogenesis for treating hypoplastic maxilla in patients with cleft lip and palate- A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kaur H; Grover S; Singaraju GS; Sidhu MS; Jaglan A; Dogra N
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1S):101308. PubMed ID: 36220549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal stability after maxillary distraction osteogenesis or conventional Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate: A superimposition-based cephalometric analysis.
Lundberg J; Al-Taai N; Levring Jäghagen E; Ransjö M; Sjöström M
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):925-934. PubMed ID: 38363518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary advancement with conventional orthognathic surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: is it a stable technique?
Saltaji H; Major MP; Alfakir H; Al-Saleh MA; Flores-Mir C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2859-66. PubMed ID: 22677329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Hirano A; Suzuki H
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Jan; 38(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11204674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rigid External Le Fort I Distraction Followed by Secondary Bone Grafting for Maxillary Advancements in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Tobolowsky W; Gupta P; Lopez J; Cho R; Mundinger GS; Yang R; Tufaro AP
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):1974-1978. PubMed ID: 31232986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia.
Baek SH; Lee JK; Lee JH; Kim MJ; Kim JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 18(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 17912117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Le Fort III distraction using rotation advancement of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate.
Hettinger PC; Hanson PR; Denny AD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):1532-1541. PubMed ID: 24281581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term follow-up of large maxillary advancements with distraction osteogenesis in growing and non-growing cleft lip and palate patients.
Meazzini MC; Basile V; Mazzoleni F; Bozzetti A; Brusati R
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jan; 68(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 25287581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What is the relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients? A systematic review.
Velasques BD; Moura LB; Martins JR; Damian MF; Xavier CB
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 25(2):139-148. PubMed ID: 32940776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midfacial Changes Through Anterior Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Kanzaki H; Imai Y; Nakajo T; Daimaruya T; Sato A; Tachi M; Nunomura Y; Itagaki Y; Nishimura K; Kochi S; Igarashi K
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 28141644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.
Figueroa AA; Polley JW; Friede H; Ko EW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. PubMed ID: 15509923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technical Modifications Specific to the Cleft Le Fort I Osteotomy.
Susarla SM; Ettinger R; Preston K; Hitesh Kapadia ; Egbert MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(5):1459-1463. PubMed ID: 32282690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cleft Lip and Palate: Le Fort I Distraction Using an Internal Device.
Gibreel W; Wlodarczyk JR; Wolfswinkel EM; Yen S; Urata MM; Hammoudeh JA
Clin Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 48(3):407-417. PubMed ID: 34051894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-Year Treatment Outcome of Profile Changes After Transcutaneous Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Children With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Gao WL; Lee YH; Tsai CY; Wu TJ; Lai JP; Lin SS; Chang YJ
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2022 Mar; 59(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 33813912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation Between Speech Outcomes and the Amount of Maxillary Advancement After Orthognathic Surgery (Le Fort I Conventional Osteotomy and Distraction Osteogenesis) in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.
Chung J; Lim J; Park H; Yoo A; Kim S; Koo Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 30(6):1855-1858. PubMed ID: 31107383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the Distance of Maxillary Advancement on Horizontal Relapse After Orthognathic Surgery.
Fahradyan A; Wolfswinkel EM; Clarke N; Park S; Tsuha M; Urata MM; Hammoudeh JA; Yamashita DR
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Apr; 55(4):546-553. PubMed ID: 29554455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
