144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34543175)
1. Commentary: Some Questions about No-Fault Reform of the Medical Liability System.
Nelson EL
Healthc Policy; 2021 Aug; 17(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 34543175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accountability sought by patients following adverse events from medical care: the New Zealand experience.
Bismark M; Dauer E; Paterson R; Studdert D
CMAJ; 2006 Oct; 175(8):889-94. PubMed ID: 17030939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The debate on no-fault compensation in the Netherlands.
Dute J
Med Law; 2005 Dec; 24(4):691-701. PubMed ID: 16440864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Canada's System of Liability Coverage in the Event of Medical Harm: Is It Time for No-Fault Reform?
Lee SK; Rowe BH; Flood CM; Mahl SK
Healthc Policy; 2021 Aug; 17(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 34543174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malpractice. Can no-fault work?
Weiss GG
Med Econ; 2004 Jun; 81(11):66-9, 71. PubMed ID: 15239646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical liability and patient safety.
Sage WM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; 22(4):26-36. PubMed ID: 12889746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician accountability, patient safety and patient compensation.
Gray JE
World Hosp Health Serv; 2006; 42(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 16900793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Compensation for medical injury in New Zealand: does "'no-fault" increase the level of claims making and reduce social and clinical selectivity?
Davis P; Lay-Yee R; Fitzjohn J; Hider P; Briant R; Schug S
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2002 Oct; 27(5):833-54. PubMed ID: 12465781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "No fault" medical malpractice systems: the wrong medicine for Georgia doctors.
Huff DJ
J Med Assoc Ga; 2013; 102(1):24, 28. PubMed ID: 24003618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New Zealand's 2005 'no-fault' compensation reforms and medical professional accountability for harm.
Wallis K
N Z Med J; 2013 Mar; 126(1371):33-44. PubMed ID: 23793119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No-fault compensation for medical injuries: the prospect for error prevention.
Studdert DM; Brennan TA
JAMA; 2001 Jul; 286(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 11448285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. NO-FAULT COMPENSATION FOR MEDICAL INJURIES: TRENDS AND CHALLENGES.
Kassim PN
Med Law; 2014 Dec; 33(4):21-53. PubMed ID: 27351046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moving beyond the blame game.
Ignagni K
Front Health Serv Manage; 2003; 20(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 14510312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No-fault compensation systems.
Tucker WS
CMAJ; 2008 Dec; 179(12):1300-1. PubMed ID: 19047613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A New Argument for No-Fault Compensation in Health Care: The Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Systems.
Holm S; Stanton C; Bartlett B
Health Care Anal; 2021 Sep; 29(3):171-188. PubMed ID: 33745121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Health courts" and accountability for patient safety.
Mello MM; Studdert DM; Kachalia AB; Brennan TA
Milbank Q; 2006; 84(3):459-92. PubMed ID: 16953807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?
Barker IR
Med Law; 2015 Sep; 34(1):595-602. PubMed ID: 30759953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Malpractice reform: one state's example.
Saxton JW; Finkelstein MM
Manag Care Interface; 2003 Jul; 16(7):45-8. PubMed ID: 12908218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Claiming behaviour in a no-fault system of medical injury: a descriptive analysis of claimants and non-claimants.
Bismark MM; Brennan TA; Davis PB; Studdert DM
Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 16922665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No-fault compensation in New Zealand: harmonizing injury compensation, provider accountability, and patient safety.
Bismark M; Paterson R
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(1):278-83. PubMed ID: 16403765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
