These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34543460)

  • 1. Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Brügger LV; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 34543460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
    Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five-year evaluation of implants placed at extraction and with dehiscences and fenestration defects augmented with ePTFE membranes: results from a prospective multicenter study.
    Becker W; Dahlin C; Lekholm U; Bergstrom C; van Steenberghe D; Higuchi K; Becker BE
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 1999; 1(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11359308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a polyethylene glycol membrane and a collagen membrane for the treatment of bone dehiscence defects at bone level implants-A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Mihatovic I; Cordaro L; Windisch P; Friedmann A; Blanco Carrion J; Sanz Sanchez I; Hallman M; Quirynen M; Hammerle CHF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1105-1115. PubMed ID: 32875638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
    Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():113-23. PubMed ID: 19663958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and radiographic intra-subject comparison of implants placed with or without guided bone regeneration: 15-year results.
    Benic GI; Bernasconi M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Mar; 44(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 27978603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
    Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials.
    Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11168266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Waller T; Herzog M; Thoma DS; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 32011015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients.
    Bazrafshan N; Darby I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 23647237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
    Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early loading of implants in vertically augmented bone with non-resorbable membranes and deproteinised anorganic bovine bone. An uncontrolled prospective cohort study.
    Todisco M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 20467598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Retrospective Evaluation of 192 Implants Placed in Augmented Bone: Long-Term Follow-Up Study.
    Beretta M; Cicciù M; Poli PP; Rancitelli D; Bassi G; Grossi GB; Maiorana C
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):669-74. PubMed ID: 25686360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.
    Benic GI; Ge Y; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Schneider D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 26856399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
    Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Stability of Augmented Bone Between Two Different Membranes Used for Guided Bone Regeneration Simultaneous with Dental Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone.
    Arunjaroensuk S; Panmekiate S; Pimkhaokham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):206–216. PubMed ID: 29028848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implants sites with concomitant bone regeneration using a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane result in stable marginal bone levels and similar profilometric outcomes over 5 years.
    Naenni N; Stucki L; Hüsler J; Schneider D; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Aug; 32(8):893-904. PubMed ID: 33977571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.
    Tang YL; Yuan J; Song YL; Ma W; Chao X; Li DH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 24330035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.