155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34544645)
1. Optimisation of the AP abdomen projection for larger patient body thicknesses.
Gatt S; Portelli JL; Zarb F
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Feb; 28(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 34544645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the use of higher kVp and copper filtration as a dose optimisation tool in digital planar radiography.
Mifsud K; Portelli JL; Zarb F; Couto JG
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):586-592. PubMed ID: 35504239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective dose and image quality for different patient sizes during AP upper abdominal radiography: A phantom study.
Alzyoud K; Al-Murshedi S; England A
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Dec; 202():111060. PubMed ID: 37806283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of body part thickness on AP pelvis radiographic image quality and effective dose.
Alzyoud K; Hogg P; Snaith B; Flintham K; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2019 Feb; 25(1):e11-e17. PubMed ID: 30599841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of X-ray scatter correction software on abdomen radiography in terms of image quality and radiation dose.
Sayed M; Knapp KM; Fulford J; Heales C; Alqahtani SJ
Radiography (Lond); 2024 May; 30(4):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 38797045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the use of anti-scatter grids in adult knee radiography.
Abela N; Guilherme Couto J; Zarb F; Mizzi D
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Aug; 28(3):663-667. PubMed ID: 35623269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antero-posterior (AP) pelvis x-ray imaging on a trolley: Impact of trolley design, mattress design and radiographer practice on image quality and radiation dose.
Tugwell JR; England A; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 28687293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference?
Reid J; Gamberoni J; Dong F; Davros W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Oct; 195(4):1015-20. PubMed ID: 20858833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-circumference-adapted dose regulation in body computed tomography. A practical and flexible formula.
Nyman U; Ahl TL; Kristiansson M; Nilsson L; Wettemark S
Acta Radiol; 2005 Jul; 46(4):396-406. PubMed ID: 16134317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
Wenman A; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gridless adult cervical spine radiography and its' effect on image quality and radiation dose: A phantom study.
Mekis N; Bianchi T; Doyle C; Gauchat M; Geerling I; Linneman J; Staats S; Campeanu C
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):359-366. PubMed ID: 38141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of 80-kVp scan and raw data-based iterative reconstruction for reduced iodine load abdominal-pelvic CT in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy referred for oncological assessment: effects on radiation dose, image quality and renal function.
Nagayama Y; Tanoue S; Tsuji A; Urata J; Furusawa M; Oda S; Nakaura T; Utsunomiya D; Yoshida E; Yoshida M; Kidoh M; Tateishi M; Yamashita Y
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170632. PubMed ID: 29470108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the anode heel effect be used to optimise radiation dose and image quality for AP pelvis radiography?
Mraity HAAB; Walton L; England A; Thompson J; Lanca L; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e103-e108. PubMed ID: 32052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of the effect of tube potential on clinical image quality using direct digital detectors for pelvis and lumbar spine radiographs.
Peacock NE; Steward AL; Riley PJ
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Dec; 67(4):260-268. PubMed ID: 32495517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. THE IMPACT OF OBESITY ON ABDOMINAL CT RADIATION DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY.
Qurashi AA; Rainford LA; Alshamrani KM; Foley SJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Nov; 185(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 30508172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality comparison between single energy and dual energy CT protocols for hepatic imaging.
Yao Y; Ng JM; Megibow AJ; Pelc NJ
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4877. PubMed ID: 27487905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
