These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men's) published research. Wu C; Fuller S; Shi Z; Wilkes R PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230043. PubMed ID: 32236109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of your success lies at the centre of your co-authorship network. Servia-Rodríguez S; Noulas A; Mascolo C; Fernández-Vilas A; Díaz-Redondo RP PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0114302. PubMed ID: 25760732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gendered citation patterns among the scientific elite. Lerman K; Yu Y; Morstatter F; Pujara J Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Oct; 119(40):e2206070119. PubMed ID: 36161888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. West JD; Jacquet J; King MM; Correll SJ; Bergstrom CT PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e66212. PubMed ID: 23894278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Authorship climate: A new tool for studying ethical issues in authorship. Douglas HM; Elliott KC; Settles IH; Montgomery GM; Davis T; Nadolsky L; Cheruvelil KS Account Res; 2024 Jul; 31(5):403-427. PubMed ID: 36288536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities. Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Woman authorship in pre-print versus peer-reviewed oral health-related publications: A two-year observational study. Rajendran L; Khandelwal N; Feine J; Ioannidou E PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260791. PubMed ID: 34871320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Huang J; Gates AJ; Sinatra R; Barabási AL Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(9):4609-4616. PubMed ID: 32071248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advancing gender equality through the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science: an exploratory study of women's and men's perceptions. Ovseiko PV; Chapple A; Edmunds LD; Ziebland S Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Feb; 15(1):12. PubMed ID: 28222735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A gender perspective on the global migration of scholars. Zhao X; Akbaritabar A; Kashyap R; Zagheni E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Mar; 120(10):e2214664120. PubMed ID: 36848569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploring scholars' public engagement goals in Canada and the United States. Besley JC; Newman TP; Dudo A; Tiffany LA Public Underst Sci; 2020 Nov; 29(8):855-867. PubMed ID: 32878551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender and venture capital decision-making: the effects of technical background and social capital on entrepreneurial evaluations. Tinkler JE; Bunker Whittington K; Ku MC; Davies AR Soc Sci Res; 2015 May; 51():1-16. PubMed ID: 25769848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. Campbell LG; Mehtani S; Dozier ME; Rinehart J PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e79147. PubMed ID: 24205372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Casad BJ; Franks JE; Garasky CE; Kittleman MM; Roesler AC; Hall DY; Petzel ZW J Neurosci Res; 2021 Jan; 99(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 33103281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What Constitutes Authorship in the Social Sciences? Pruschak G Front Res Metr Anal; 2021; 6():655350. PubMed ID: 33870072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The persistence of pay inequality: The gender pay gap in an anonymous online labor market. Litman L; Robinson J; Rosen Z; Rosenzweig C; Waxman J; Bates LM PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229383. PubMed ID: 32084233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]