153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34546731)
1. Effects of the Probiotic Activity of
Kruse S; Pierre F; Morlock GE
J Agric Food Chem; 2021 Sep; 69(38):11272-11281. PubMed ID: 34546731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strain-specific quantification of probiotic Bacillus subtilis in feed by imaging high-performance thin-layer chromatography.
Kruse S; Becker S; Pierre F; Morlock GE
J Chromatogr A; 2022 Aug; 1679():463393. PubMed ID: 35964465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacillus subtilis spores in probiotic feed quantified via bacterial metabolite using planar chromatography.
Kruse S; Schenk M; Pierre F; Morlock GE
Anal Chim Acta; 2022 Aug; 1221():340124. PubMed ID: 35934361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging high-performance thin-layer chromatography as powerful tool to visualize metabolite profiles of eight Bacillus candidates upon cultivation and growth behavior.
Kruse S; Pierre F; Morlock G
J Chromatogr A; 2021 Mar; 1640():461929. PubMed ID: 33610132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolic profiling of bacterial co-cultures reveals intermicrobiome interactions and dominant species.
Kruse S; Becker S; Pierre F; Morlock GE
J Chromatogr A; 2023 Apr; 1694():463911. PubMed ID: 36931138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect-directed screening of Bacillus lipopeptide extracts via hyphenated high-performance thin-layer chromatography.
Jamshidi-Aidji M; Dimkić I; Ristivojević P; Stanković S; Morlock GE
J Chromatogr A; 2019 Nov; 1605():460366. PubMed ID: 31378526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Ruiz Sella SRB; Bueno T; de Oliveira AAB; Karp SG; Soccol CR
Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2021 May; 41(3):355-369. PubMed ID: 33563053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro evaluation of candidate Bacillus spp. for animal feed.
Mingmongkolchai S; Panbangred W
J Gen Appl Microbiol; 2017 May; 63(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 28331163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Throughput screening of Bacillus subtilis strains that abundantly secrete surfactin in vitro identifies effective probiotic candidates.
Lee D; Oh T; Kang B; Ahn JS; Cho Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277412. PubMed ID: 36417387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening of Bacillus strains as potential probiotics and subsequent confirmation of the in vivo effectiveness of Bacillus subtilis MA139 in pigs.
Guo X; Li D; Lu W; Piao X; Chen X
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2006 Aug; 90(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 16820971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of Bacillus spp. strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed.
Larsen N; Thorsen L; Kpikpi EN; Stuer-Lauridsen B; Cantor MD; Nielsen B; Brockmann E; Derkx PM; Jespersen L
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Feb; 98(3):1105-18. PubMed ID: 24201893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dietary effects of commercial probiotics on growth performance, digestibility, and intestinal morphometry of broiler chickens.
Dela Cruz PJD; Dagaas CT; Mangubat KMM; Angeles AA; Abanto OD
Trop Anim Health Prod; 2019 Jun; 51(5):1105-1115. PubMed ID: 30617722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence characteristics and genotypes of Bacillus spp. from probiotic products of diverse origins.
Deng F; Chen Y; Sun T; Wu Y; Su Y; Liu C; Zhou J; Deng Y; Wen J
Food Res Int; 2021 Jan; 139():109949. PubMed ID: 33509502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production.
Mingmongkolchai S; Panbangred W
J Appl Microbiol; 2018 Jun; 124(6):1334-1346. PubMed ID: 29316021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 spores as a probiotic feed supplement on growth performance, noxious gas emission, and intestinal microflora in broilers.
Jeong JS; Kim IH
Poult Sci; 2014 Dec; 93(12):3097-103. PubMed ID: 25260523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 on sow and progeny performance, fecal consistency, and fecal microbes during gestation, lactation, and nursery periods1,2.
Menegat MB; DeRouchey JM; Woodworth JC; Dritz SS; Tokach MD; Goodband RD
J Anim Sci; 2019 Sep; 97(9):3920-3937. PubMed ID: 31292631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential Probiotics Bacillus subtilis KATMIRA1933 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 Co-Aggregate with Clinical Isolates of Proteus mirabilis and Prevent Biofilm Formation.
Algburi A; Alazzawi SA; Al-Ezzy AIA; Weeks R; Chistyakov V; Chikindas ML
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2020 Dec; 12(4):1471-1483. PubMed ID: 31989448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of Direct-fed Microbial Supplementation, as an Alternative to Antibiotics, on Growth Performance, Intestinal Immune Status, and Epithelial Barrier Gene Expression in Broiler Chickens.
Gadde U; Oh ST; Lee YS; Davis E; Zimmerman N; Rehberger T; Lillehoj HS
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2017 Dec; 9(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 28421423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification and characterization of Bacillus subtilis from grass carp (Ctenopharynodon idellus) for use as probiotic additives in aquatic feed.
Guo X; Chen DD; Peng KS; Cui ZW; Zhang XJ; Li S; Zhang YA
Fish Shellfish Immunol; 2016 May; 52():74-84. PubMed ID: 26988285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bacillus subtilis isolates from camel milk as probiotic candidates.
Daneshazari R; Rabbani Khorasgani M; Hosseini-Abari A; Kim JH
Sci Rep; 2023 Feb; 13(1):3387. PubMed ID: 36854714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
