These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34546765)

  • 21. Rating the intelligibility of dysarthic speech amongst people with Parkinson's Disease: a comparison of trained and untrained listeners.
    Smith CH; Patel S; Woolley RL; Brady MC; Rick CE; Halfpenny R; Rontiris A; Knox-Smith L; Dowling F; Clarke CE; Au P; Ives N; Wheatley K; Sackley CM
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2019; 33(10-11):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 31035809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of clear speech on auditory-perceptual judgments of electrolaryngeal speech.
    Cox SR; Doyle PC
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 75():25-36. PubMed ID: 30005317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
    Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Petty SH; Dardarananda R
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Feb; 53(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 3339865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
    Evitts P; Gallop R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of fundamental frequency on judgments of electrolaryngeal speech.
    Nagle KF; Eadie TL; Wright DR; Sumida YA
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2012 May; 21(2):154-66. PubMed ID: 22355005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptions of tonal changes in normal laryngeal, esophageal, and artificial laryngeal male Cantonese speakers.
    Ng ML; Lerman JW; Gilbert HR
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1998; 50(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 9624857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Voice onset time in Thai alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Petty SH; Dardarananda R
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1987 Aug; 52(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 3455451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving alaryngeal speech intelligibility.
    Christensen JM; Dwyer PE
    J Commun Disord; 1990 Dec; 23(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 2286725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Intelligibility of stop-plosive and fricative consonants produced by tracheoesophageal speakers in quiet and noise.
    Failla S; Doyle PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):4075. PubMed ID: 32611144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Airflow characteristics of fricative consonants produced by normally hearing and hearing-impaired speakers.
    Whitehead RL; Barefoot SM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 6887804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech intelligibility in tone language (Chinese) laryngectomy speakers.
    Yiu EM; van Hasselt CA; Williams SR; Woo JK
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1994; 29(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 7647385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Generating Tonal Distinctions in Mandarin Chinese Using an Electrolarynx with Preprogrammed Tone Patterns.
    Guo L; Nagle K; Heaton JT
    Speech Commun; 2016 Apr; 78():34-41. PubMed ID: 26951783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech performance of adult cantonese-speaking laryngectomees using different types of alaryngeal phonation.
    Ng ML; Kwok CL; Chow SF
    J Voice; 1997 Sep; 11(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 9297679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Syllabification of intervocalic consonants by English and Japanese speakers.
    Ishikawa K
    Lang Speech; 2002 Dec; 45(Pt 4):355-85. PubMed ID: 12866909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of speaker and listener variables on intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Patel R; Usher N; Kember H; Russell S; Laures-Gore J
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():13-8. PubMed ID: 25113966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development and perceptual evaluation of amplitude-based F0 control in electrolarynx speech.
    Saikachi Y; Stevens KN; Hillman RE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 52(5):1360-9. PubMed ID: 19564438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Features of listeners affecting the perceptions of Mandarin electrolaryngeal speech.
    Liu H; Wan M; Wang S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 15655337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stability of Speech Intelligibility Measures Over Repeated Sampling Times in Speakers With Acquired Apraxia of Speech.
    Vitti E; Mauszycki S; Bunker L; Wambaugh J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Jun; 30(3S):1429-1445. PubMed ID: 33761278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intelligibility of oesophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech: preliminary observations.
    Max L; De Bruyn W; Steurs W
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 9519117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.