These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34546833)

  • 1. What characteristics make self-generated memory cues effective over time?
    Tullis JG; Finley JR
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1308-1319. PubMed ID: 34546833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues.
    Tullis JG; Fraundorf SH
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):765-781. PubMed ID: 34731430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cueing others' memories.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):634-46. PubMed ID: 25377508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generating mnemonics boosts recall of chemistry information.
    Tullis JG; Qiu J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Mar; 28(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 33939460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information.
    Murphy DH; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):895-911. PubMed ID: 33474691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of mood and retrieval cues on semantic memory and metacognition.
    Hall ACG; Evans DG; Higginbotham L; Thompson KS
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Jun; 61(3):333-347. PubMed ID: 32196673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.
    Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS
    Memory; 2016 Sep; 24(8):1108-22. PubMed ID: 26247369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using Self-Generated Cues to Facilitate Recall: A Narrative Review.
    Wheeler RL; Gabbert F
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1830. PubMed ID: 29163254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motivation-based selective encoding and retrieval.
    Halamish V; Stern P
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):736-750. PubMed ID: 34939167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.
    Templer VL; Lee KA; Preston AJ
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):891-906. PubMed ID: 28669115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating memory reactivity with a within-participant manipulation of judgments of learning: support for the cue-strengthening hypothesis.
    Rivers ML; Janes JL; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1342-1353. PubMed ID: 34635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.
    Konstantakopoulos G
    Psychiatriki; 2019; 30(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 31115349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metacognitive processes accompanying the first stages of autobiographical retrieval in the self-memory system.
    Carreras F; Moulin CJA; Tales A; Barnes CM; Souchay C
    Memory; 2024 Jul; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38963905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
    Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of knowledge about the use of cues to aid prospective retrieval.
    Beal CR
    Child Dev; 1985 Jun; 56(3):631-42. PubMed ID: 4006571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.