172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34546997)
1. Should Pertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures Be Treated with a Short or Long Intramedullary Nail?: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Viberg B; Eriksen L; Højsager KD; Højsager FD; Lauritsen J; Palm H; Overgaard S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Dec; 103(24):2291-2298. PubMed ID: 34546997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison and analysis of reoperations in two different treatment protocols for trochanteric hip fractures - postoperative technical complications with dynamic hip screw, intramedullary nail and Medoff sliding plate.
Paulsson J; Stig JC; Olsson O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):364. PubMed ID: 28836973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
Grønhaug KML; Dybvik E; Matre K; Östman B; Gjertsen JE
Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):274-282. PubMed ID: 35094569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures: An Observational Study of 13,232 Fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
Grønhaug KML; Dybvik E; Matre K; Östman B; Gjertsen JE
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Aug; 105(16):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 37418538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants.
Panteli M; Vun JSH; West RM; Howard A; Pountos I; Giannoudis PV
J Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Jun; 23(1):27. PubMed ID: 35764711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduced Risk of Reoperation Using Intramedullary Nailing with Femoral Neck Protection in Low-Energy Femoral Shaft Fractures.
Bögl HP; Zdolsek G; Michaëlsson K; Höijer J; Schilcher J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Sep; 102(17):1486-1494. PubMed ID: 32701713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in a Level I Trauma Center in Finland: What Complications Can be Expected?
Lähdesmäki M; Ylitalo AA; Karjalainen L; Uimonen M; Mattila VM; Repo JP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Feb; 482(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 37582281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2).
Boone C; Carlberg KN; Koueiter DM; Baker KC; Sadowski J; Wiater PJ; Nowinski GP; Grant KD
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 May; 28(5):e96-e100. PubMed ID: 24751609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subtrochanteric femoral fractures treated with the Long Gamma3® nail: A historical control case study versus Long trochanteric Gamma nail®.
Georgiannos D; Lampridis V; Bisbinas I
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Oct; 101(6):675-80. PubMed ID: 26315346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Treatment of Subtrochanteric Fractures, Our Experience, Complications].
Pavelka T; SalÁŠek M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(4):259-267. PubMed ID: 32940221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.
Kleweno C; Morgan J; Redshaw J; Harris M; Rodriguez E; Zurakowski D; Vrahas M; Appleton P
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Jul; 28(7):391-7. PubMed ID: 24231580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Loss of offset after pertrochanteric hip fractures affects hip function one year after surgery with a short intramedullary nail. A prospective cohort study.
Gordon M; Berntsson PO; Sjölund E; Demir Y; Hedbeck CJ; Stark A; Sköldenberg O
Int Orthop; 2016 Apr; 40(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26105765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nails for Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study.
Shannon SF; Yuan BJ; Cross WW; Barlow JD; Torchia ME; Holte PK; Sems SA
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Oct; 33(10):480-486. PubMed ID: 31232891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?
Goodnough LH; Salazar BP; Furness J; Feng JE; DeBaun MR; Campbell ST; Lucas JF; Cross WW; Leucht P; Grant KD; Gardner MJ; Bishop JA
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2021 Apr; 31(3):421-427. PubMed ID: 32909108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
Parker MJ; Handoll HH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): long versus short cephalomedullary nailing.
Hou Z; Bowen TR; Irgit KS; Matzko ME; Andreychik CM; Horwitz DS; Smith WR
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Jun; 27(6):318-24. PubMed ID: 22955331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative peri-implant fracture after osteosynthesis for geriatric femoral pertrochanteric fracture with the linear compression integrated screw intramedullary nail system (INTERTAN™): a retrospective study.
Lai CY; Liu CH; Lai PJ; Hsu YH; Chou YC; Yu YH
J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Dec; 18(1):932. PubMed ID: 38057901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is helical blade nailing superior to locked minimally invasive plating in unstable pertrochanteric fractures?
Knobe M; Drescher W; Heussen N; Sellei RM; Pape HC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 470(8):2302-12. PubMed ID: 22311725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up.
Matre K; Vinje T; Havelin LI; Gjertsen JE; Furnes O; Espehaug B; Kjellevold SH; Fevang JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Feb; 95(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 23389782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
