These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34547404)
21. A comparison of machine learning algorithms and covariate balance measures for propensity score matching and weighting. Cannas M; Arpino B Biom J; 2019 Jul; 61(4):1049-1072. PubMed ID: 31090108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An evaluation of exact matching and propensity score methods as applied in a comparative effectiveness study of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Burden A; Roche N; Miglio C; Hillyer EV; Postma DS; Herings RM; Overbeek JA; Khalid JM; van Eickels D; Price DB Pragmat Obs Res; 2017; 8():15-30. PubMed ID: 28356782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Propensity score: A credible alternative to randomization?]. Filleron T; Kwiatowski F Bull Cancer; 2016 Jan; 103(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 26657188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research. Barnieh L; James MT; Zhang J; Hemmelgarn BR J Nephrol; 2011; 24(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 21404223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate. Hade EM; Lu B Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 23787715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Effect of Payer Status on the Survival of Colon Cancer Patients. Shi L; Suh W; Kavanaugh MM; Mills G; Thayer S; Shi R Cureus; 2021 Jun; 13(6):e15748. PubMed ID: 34285854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Propensity score matching: a conceptual review for radiology researchers. Baek S; Park SH; Won E; Park YR; Kim HJ Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 25741190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Review of Propensity-Score Methods and Their Use in Cardiovascular Research. Deb S; Austin PC; Tu JV; Ko DT; Mazer CD; Kiss A; Fremes SE Can J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 32(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 26315351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does completion of sputum smear monitoring have an effect on treatment success and cure rate among adult tuberculosis patients in rural Eastern Uganda? A propensity score-matched analysis. Izudi J; Tamwesigire IK; Bajunirwe F PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226919. PubMed ID: 31877177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Practical considerations of utilizing propensity score methods in clinical development using real-world and historical data. Li Q; Lin J; Chi A; Davies S Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 97():106123. PubMed ID: 32853779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines. Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Propensity score matching versus coarsened exact matching in observational comparative effectiveness research. Guy D; Karp I; Wilk P; Chin J; Rodrigues G J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Aug; 10(11):939-951. PubMed ID: 34060903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Selecting an appropriate caliper can be essential for achieving good balance with propensity score matching. Lunt M Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 179(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 24114655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gustave Roussy Immune Score based on a three-category risk assessment scale serves as a novel and effective prognostic indicator for surgically resectable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: A propensity score matching retrospective cohort study. Li SJ; Zhao L; Wang HY; Zhou HN; Ju J; Du H; Che GW Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():25-40. PubMed ID: 33086147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Survival After Curative Resection in Patients with Colon Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matching Studies. Ishizuka M; Shimizu T; Shibuya N; Takagi K; Hachiya H; Nishi Y; Suda K; Aoki T; Kubota K Oncologist; 2021 Mar; 26(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 33031622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using propensity scores to estimate effects of treatment initiation decisions: State of the science. Webster-Clark M; Stürmer T; Wang T; Man K; Marinac-Dabic D; Rothman KJ; Ellis AR; Gokhale M; Lunt M; Girman C; Glynn RJ Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1718-1735. PubMed ID: 33377193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance of matching methods in studies of rare diseases: a simulation study. Cenzer I; Boscardin WJ; Berger K Intractable Rare Dis Res; 2020 May; 9(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 32494554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of endostatin combined with PT-DC versus bevacizumab combined with PT-DC in the first-line treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Chen X; Nie J; Dai L; Hu W; Zhang J; Han J; Ma X; Tian G; Han S; Wu D; Wang Y; Long J; Zhang Z; Fang J Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jul; 10(7):7847-7856. PubMed ID: 34353072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]