These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34547786)

  • 1. Evaluation and Comparison of Self-Made and Commercial Calibration Markers for Radiographic Magnification Correction in Veterinary Digital Radiography.
    Klever J; de Motte A; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Brühschwein A
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Jan; 35(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 34547786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pre-operative templating for total hip arthroplasty: How does radiographic technique and calibration marker placement affect image magnification?
    Holliday M; Steward A
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):228-236. PubMed ID: 33590673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using two different scale markers: a comparative study.
    Baxter JA; Barlow T; Karthikeyan S; Mayo DJ; King RJ
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 22344481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography.
    Schulze R; Krummenauer F; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10654037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distortion and magnification of four digital cephalometric units.
    Song GY; Li G; Lu WH; Han B; Xu TM
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1644-1653. PubMed ID: 31793469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography.
    Read RL; Duncan CG; Wallace AD; Perry JA; Duerr FM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 241(6):782-7. PubMed ID: 22947163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a stepped, fixed-height magnification marker stand for use with a 100-mm marker in implant sizing prediction in 52 total hip replacement procedures in dogs.
    Siemon HK; Liska WD; Israel SK
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280334. PubMed ID: 36626397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inaccuracies in the Use of Magnification Markers in Digital Hip Radiographs.
    Archibeck MJ; Cummins T; Tripuraneni KR; Carothers JT; Murray-Krezan C; Hattab M; White RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 474(8):1812-7. PubMed ID: 26797909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of calibration on digital templating of hip arthroplasty.
    Boese CK; Wilhelm S; Haneder S; Lechler P; Eysel P; Bredow J
    Int Orthop; 2019 Aug; 43(8):1799-1805. PubMed ID: 30132182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Size estimation and magnification error in radiographic imaging: implications for classification of arteriovenous malformations.
    Elisevich K; Cunningham IA; Assis L
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1995 Mar; 16(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 7793378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The magnification of digital radiographs in the trauma patient: implications for templating.
    King RJ; Craig PR; Boreham BG; Majeed MA; Moran CG
    Injury; 2009 Feb; 40(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19095234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography.
    Wunderlich W; Roehrig B; Fischer F; Arntz HR; Agrawal R; Morguet A; Schultheiss HP; Horstkotte D
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Aug; 14(4):217-27. PubMed ID: 9934610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital correction of magnification in pelvic x rays for preoperative planning of hip joint replacements: theoretical development and clinical results of a new protocol.
    The B; Diercks RL; Stewart RE; van Ooijen PM; van Horn JR
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2580-9. PubMed ID: 16193788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image magnification in digital fluoroscopy.
    Rosenstein DS
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 9710131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography.
    Franken M; Grimm B; Heyligers I
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jan; 92(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 20044692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement accuracy: a comparison of two intra-oral digital radiographic systems, RadioVisiography-S and FlashDent, with analog film.
    Scarfe WC; Norton S; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9161164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method.
    Boese CK; Wilhelm S; Haneder S; Lechler P; Eysel P; Bredow J
    Int Orthop; 2019 Mar; 43(3):589-595. PubMed ID: 29922839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is it Important to Know Where to Place the Spherical Marker for Hip Replacement Digital Planning?
    Polesello GC; Salerno TT; Rezende JHZ; de Queiroz MC; Rabelo ND; Ricioli Junior W
    Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2020 Jun; 55(3):353-359. PubMed ID: 32616982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calibration Markers for Digital Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Boese CK; Lechler P; Rose L; Dargel J; Oppermann J; Eysel P; Geiges H; Bredow J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0128529. PubMed ID: 26168410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice.
    Park JB
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2010 Jul; 15(4):e663-6. PubMed ID: 20173717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.