These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34547928)
1. Flexible extension of the accelerated failure time model to account for nonlinear and time-dependent effects of covariates on the hazard. Pang M; Platt RW; Schuster T; Abrahamowicz M Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2526-2542. PubMed ID: 34547928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flexible estimation of survival curves conditional on non-linear and time-dependent predictor effects. Wynant W; Abrahamowicz M Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 26542758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the model-building strategy on inference about nonlinear and time-dependent covariate effects in survival analysis. Wynant W; Abrahamowicz M Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(19):3318-37. PubMed ID: 24757068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flexible modeling of the effects of continuous prognostic factors in relative survival. Mahboubi A; Abrahamowicz M; Giorgi R; Binquet C; Bonithon-Kopp C; Quantin C Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(12):1351-65. PubMed ID: 21432891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spline-based accelerated failure time model. Pang M; Platt RW; Schuster T; Abrahamowicz M Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(2):481-497. PubMed ID: 33105513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flexible modeling of competing risks in survival analysis. Belot A; Abrahamowicz M; Remontet L; Giorgi R Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(23):2453-68. PubMed ID: 20645282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. deepAFT: A nonlinear accelerated failure time model with artificial neural network. Norman PA; Li W; Jiang W; Chen BE Stat Med; 2024 Aug; 43(19):3689-3701. PubMed ID: 38894557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A flexible parametric accelerated failure time model and the extension to time-dependent acceleration factors. Crowther MJ; Royston P; Clements M Biostatistics; 2023 Jul; 24(3):811-831. PubMed ID: 35639824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using fractional polynomials and restricted cubic splines to model non-proportional hazards or time-varying covariate effects in the Cox regression model. Austin PC; Fang J; Lee DS Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(3):612-624. PubMed ID: 34806210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible parametric accelerated failure time model. Su S J Biopharm Stat; 2021 Sep; 31(5):650-667. PubMed ID: 34550051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical study of the dependence of the results of multivariable flexible survival analyses on model selection strategy. Binquet C; Abrahamowicz M; Mahboubi A; Jooste V; Faivre J; Bonithon-Kopp C; Quantin C Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6470-88. PubMed ID: 18837067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Royston P; Parmar MK Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(15):2175-97. PubMed ID: 12210632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accelerated failure time model: a useful alternative to the Cox regression model in survival analysis. Wei LJ Stat Med; 1992; 11(14-15):1871-9. PubMed ID: 1480879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the alternating conditional estimation algorithm for estimation of flexible extensions of Cox's proportional hazards model with nonlinear constraints on the parameters. Wynant W; Abrahamowicz M Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1445-1464. PubMed ID: 27550754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian regularization for flexible baseline hazard functions in Cox survival models. Lázaro E; Armero C; Alvares D Biom J; 2021 Jan; 63(1):7-26. PubMed ID: 32885493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Smoothing Techniques for Fitting the Nonlinear Effect of Covariate in Cox Models. Roshani D; Ghaderi E Acta Inform Med; 2016 Feb; 24(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 27041809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extended hazard regression model for reliability and survival analysis. Louzada-Neto F Lifetime Data Anal; 1997; 3(4):367-81. PubMed ID: 9503882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Joint model robustness compared with the time-varying covariate Cox model to evaluate the association between a longitudinal marker and a time-to-event endpoint. Arisido MW; Antolini L; Bernasconi DP; Valsecchi MG; Rebora P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31795933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of two formal tests based on martingales residuals to check the proportional hazard assumption and the functional form of the prognostic factors in flexible parametric excess hazard models. Danieli C; Bossard N; Roche L; Belot A; Uhry Z; Charvat H; Remontet L Biostatistics; 2017 Jul; 18(3):505-520. PubMed ID: 28334368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On a general structure for hazard-based regression models: An application to population-based cancer research. Rubio FJ; Remontet L; Jewell NP; Belot A Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2404-2417. PubMed ID: 30068256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]