These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34548174)

  • 41. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
    Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
    Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
    Gao Y; Ge L; Ma X; Shen X; Liu M; Tian J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():214-227. PubMed ID: 31150834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann TC; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Tetzlaff JM; Akl EA; Brennan SE; Chou R; Glanville J; Grimshaw JM; Hróbjartsson A; Lalu MM; Li T; Loder EW; Mayo-Wilson E; McDonald S; McGuinness LA; Stewart LA; Thomas J; Tricco AC; Welch VA; Whiting P; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 134():178-189. PubMed ID: 33789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.
    Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A
    Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
    Page MJ; McKenzie JE; Bossuyt PM; Boutron I; Hoffmann TC; Mulrow CD; Shamseer L; Tetzlaff JM; Akl EA; Brennan SE; Chou R; Glanville J; Grimshaw JM; Hróbjartsson A; Lalu MM; Li T; Loder EW; Mayo-Wilson E; McDonald S; McGuinness LA; Stewart LA; Thomas J; Tricco AC; Welch VA; Whiting P; Moher D
    BMJ; 2021 Mar; 372():n71. PubMed ID: 33782057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Replicate systematic review and meta-analyses on robotic surgery: a quality appraisal and overlap investigation.
    Ji J; Zhang H; Xu D; Zhang T; Kong D; Xiao G; Cao Z; Wang F; Gao X; Sun YH
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):384-395. PubMed ID: 30972621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients-A methodological study.
    Siemens W; Schwarzer G; Rohe MS; Buroh S; Meerpohl JJ; Becker G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():84-95. PubMed ID: 33741503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.
    Motahari-Nezhad H; Al-Abdulkarim H; Fgaier M; Abid MM; Péntek M; Gulácsi L; Zrubka Z
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Dec; 24(12):e41042. PubMed ID: 36542427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Reviews Using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).
    Yuan M; Wu J; Austin RE; Hofer SOP; Lista F; Ahmad J
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e3897. PubMed ID: 34815919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on direct oral anticoagulants in the past 5 years.
    Eshaghpour A; Li A; Javidan AP; Chen N; Yang S; Crowther MA
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 32493834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias.
    Brito JP; Tsapas A; Griebeler ML; Wang Z; Prutsky GJ; Domecq JP; Murad MH; Montori VM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 23510557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.
    Ndze VN; Jaca A; Wiysonge CS
    Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(12):2836-2843. PubMed ID: 31166843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study.
    Sargeant JM; Reynolds K; Winder CB; O'Connor AM
    Prev Vet Med; 2021 Oct; 195():105472. PubMed ID: 34438246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview.
    Ji Z; Zhang J; Menniti-Ippolito F; Massari M; Fauci AJ; Li N; Yang F; Zhang M
    BMC Complement Med Ther; 2020 Oct; 20(1):307. PubMed ID: 33054785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quality of systematic reviews supporting the 2017 ACC/AHA and 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of hypertension.
    Kanukula R; Dhurjati R; Vidyasagar K; Rehana N; Talari A; Salam A; Rodgers A; Page MJ
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2022 Apr; 27(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 34088714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of surgical randomized clinical trials.
    Yu J; Chen W; Wu P; Li Y
    BJS Open; 2020 Jun; 4(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 32109006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(1):117. PubMed ID: 28629396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.