These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34548847)

  • 1. Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.
    van Diemen PA; de Winter RW; Schumacher SP; Bom MJ; Driessen RS; Everaars H; Jukema RA; Somsen YB; Popelkova L; van de Ven PM; van Rossum AC; van de Hoef TP; de Haan S; Marques KM; Lemkes JS; Appelman Y; Nap A; Verouden NJ; Opolski MP; Danad I; Knaapen P
    J Interv Cardiol; 2021; 2021():4339451. PubMed ID: 34548847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population.
    Rubimbura V; Guillon B; Fournier S; Amabile N; Chi Pan C; Combaret N; Eeckhout E; Kibler M; Silvain J; Wijns W; Schiele F; Muller O; Meneveau N; Adjedj J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 96(6):1145-1153. PubMed ID: 31763775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
    Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of functional results of percutaneous coronary interventions with virtual stenting and quantitative flow ratio.
    Lee HJ; Mejía-Rentería H; Escaned J; Doh JH; Lee JM; Hwang D; Yuasa S; Choi KH; Jang HJ; Jeon KH; Lee J; Nam CW; Shin ES; Koo BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; 100(7):1208-1217. PubMed ID: 36321601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of immediate angiography derived residual quantitative flow ratio after bioresorbable scaffold and drug eluting stent implantation.
    Li Z; Zhan J; Han J; Fu G; Jin C
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2022 Feb; 23(2):59. PubMed ID: 35229550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.
    Westra J; Andersen BK; Campo G; Matsuo H; Koltowski L; Eftekhari A; Liu T; Di Serafino L; Di Girolamo D; Escaned J; Nef H; Naber C; Barbierato M; Tu S; Neghabat O; Madsen M; Tebaldi M; Tanigaki T; Kochman J; Somi S; Esposito G; Mercone G; Mejia-Renteria H; Ronco F; Bøtker HE; Wijns W; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jul; 7(14):. PubMed ID: 29980523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.
    Li Z; Li G; Chen L; Ding D; Chen Y; Zhang J; Xu L; Kubo T; Zhang S; Wang Y; Zhou X; Tu S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022; 16(6):509-516. PubMed ID: 35811245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physiological Distribution and Local Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Shin D; Dai N; Lee SH; Choi KH; Lefieux A; Molony D; Hwang D; Kim HK; Jeon KH; Lee HJ; Jang HJ; Ha SJ; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Doh JH; Shin ES; Nam CW; Koo BK; Gwon HC; Ge J; Lee JM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 14(16):1771-1785. PubMed ID: 34412795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II).
    Westra J; Tu S; Winther S; Nissen L; Vestergaard MB; Andersen BK; Holck EN; Fox Maule C; Johansen JK; Andreasen LN; Simonsen JK; Zhang Y; Kristensen SD; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Terkelsen CJ; Krusell LR; Jakobsen L; Reiber JHC; Lassen JF; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e007107. PubMed ID: 29555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.
    van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality.
    Zhang R; Xu B; Dou K; Guan C; Zhao Y; Wang X; Zou T; Qiao Z; Xie L; Wang H; Yuan S; Song L; Tu S; Wang Y; Wijns W
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Apr; 352():33-39. PubMed ID: 35101540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility and diagnostic reliability of quantitative flow ratio in the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome.
    Erbay A; Penzel L; Abdelwahed YS; Klotsche J; Schatz AS; Steiner J; Haghikia A; Landmesser U; Stähli BE; Leistner DM
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jun; 37(6):1815-1823. PubMed ID: 33651231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis.
    Xu B; Tu S; Qiao S; Qu X; Chen Y; Yang J; Guo L; Sun Z; Li Z; Tian F; Fang W; Chen J; Li W; Guan C; Holm NR; Wijns W; Hu S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(25):3077-3087. PubMed ID: 29101020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angio-Based Fractional Flow Reserve, Functional Pattern of Coronary Artery Disease, and Prediction of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Result: a Proof-of-Concept Study.
    Biscaglia S; Uretsky BF; Tebaldi M; Erriquez A; Brugaletta S; Cerrato E; Quadri G; Spitaleri G; Colaiori I; Di Girolamo D; Scoccia A; Zucchetti O; D'Aniello E; Manfrini M; Pavasini R; Barbato E; Campo G
    Cardiovasc Drugs Ther; 2022 Aug; 36(4):645-653. PubMed ID: 33830399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography.
    Zhang Y; Zhang S; Westra J; Ding D; Zhao Q; Yang J; Sun Z; Huang J; Pu J; Xu B; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):587-595. PubMed ID: 30535657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic Value of QFR Measured Immediately After Successful Stent Implantation: The International Multicenter Prospective HAWKEYE Study.
    Biscaglia S; Tebaldi M; Brugaletta S; Cerrato E; Erriquez A; Passarini G; Ielasi A; Spitaleri G; Di Girolamo D; Mezzapelle G; Geraci S; Manfrini M; Pavasini R; Barbato E; Campo G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2079-2088. PubMed ID: 31563688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and correlation of quantitative flow ratio with fractional flow reserve for assessment of intermediate coronary lesions.
    Kasinadhuni G; Batta A; Gawalkar AA; Budakoty S; Gupta A; Vijayvergiya R
    Acta Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 78(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 35382706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study.
    Kołtowski Ł; Zaleska M; Maksym J; Tomaniak M; Soliński M; Puchta D; Holm NR; Opolski G; Kochman J
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):858-867. PubMed ID: 30128817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Microcirculatory Dysfunction on Angiography-Based Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses.
    Mejía-Rentería H; Lee JM; Lauri F; van der Hoeven NW; de Waard GA; Macaya F; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Gonzalo N; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Nombela-Franco L; Salinas P; Núñez-Gil I; Del Trigo M; Goto S; Lee HJ; Liontou C; Fernández-Ortiz A; Macaya C; van Royen N; Koo BK; Escaned J
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(8):741-753. PubMed ID: 29673505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.