150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34549154)
1. Prediction Model of Clearance by a Novel Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Approach, Combination DeepSnap-Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning.
Mamada H; Nomura Y; Uesawa Y
ACS Omega; 2021 Sep; 6(36):23570-23577. PubMed ID: 34549154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel QSAR Approach for a Regression Model of Clearance That Combines DeepSnap-Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning.
Mamada H; Nomura Y; Uesawa Y
ACS Omega; 2022 May; 7(20):17055-17062. PubMed ID: 35647436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive Models Based on Molecular Images and Molecular Descriptors for Drug Screening.
Mamada H; Takahashi M; Ogino M; Nomura Y; Uesawa Y
ACS Omega; 2023 Oct; 8(40):37186-37195. PubMed ID: 37841172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach Predicts Progesterone Receptor Antagonist Activity With High Performance.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():485. PubMed ID: 32039185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction Model of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation by a Novel QSAR Approach, DeepSnap-Deep Learning.
Matsuzaka Y; Hosaka T; Ogaito A; Yoshinari K; Uesawa Y
Molecules; 2020 Mar; 25(6):. PubMed ID: 32183141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Molecular Image-Based Novel Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Approach, Deepsnap-Deep Learning and Machine Learning.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Curr Issues Mol Biol; 2021; 42():455-472. PubMed ID: 33339777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of a Deep-Learning Method Based on the Classification of Images Generated by Parameterized Deep Snap a Novel Molecular-Image-Input Technique for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) Analysis.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():65. PubMed ID: 30984753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular Image-Based Prediction Models of Nuclear Receptor Agonists and Antagonists Using the DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach with the Tox21 10K Library.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Molecules; 2020 Jun; 25(12):. PubMed ID: 32549344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction Model with High-Performance Constitutive Androstane Receptor (CAR) Using DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach from the Tox21 10K Compound Library.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Sep; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 31574921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Deep Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship System Construct Prediction Model of Agonist and Antagonist with High Performance.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35216254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction Models for Agonists and Antagonists of Molecular Initiation Events for Toxicity Pathways Using an Improved Deep-Learning-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship System.
Matsuzaka Y; Totoki S; Handa K; Shiota T; Kurosaki K; Uesawa Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Oct; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 34639159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ensemble Learning, Deep Learning-Based and Molecular Descriptor-Based Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.
Matsuzaka Y; Uesawa Y
Molecules; 2023 Mar; 28(5):. PubMed ID: 36903654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the reproductive toxicity of chemicals using ensemble learning methods and molecular fingerprints.
Feng H; Zhang L; Li S; Liu L; Yang T; Yang P; Zhao J; Arkin IT; Liu H
Toxicol Lett; 2021 Apr; 340():4-14. PubMed ID: 33421549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A machine learning-based approach to ERα bioactivity and drug ADMET prediction.
An T; Chen Y; Chen Y; Ma L; Wang J; Zhao J
Front Genet; 2022; 13():1087273. PubMed ID: 36685926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. Part 17: Development of Quantitative and Qualitative Prediction Models for Chemical-Induced Respiratory Toxicity.
Lei T; Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Kang Y; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
Mol Pharm; 2017 Jul; 14(7):2407-2421. PubMed ID: 28595388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploiting ensemble learning to improve prediction of phospholipidosis inducing potential.
Nath A; Sahu GK
J Theor Biol; 2019 Oct; 479():37-47. PubMed ID: 31310757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of premature all-cause mortality: A prospective general population cohort study comparing machine-learning and standard epidemiological approaches.
Weng SF; Vaz L; Qureshi N; Kai J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214365. PubMed ID: 30917171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct Comparison of Total Clearance Prediction: Computational Machine Learning Model versus Bottom-Up Approach Using In Vitro Assay.
Kosugi Y; Hosea N
Mol Pharm; 2020 Jul; 17(7):2299-2309. PubMed ID: 32478525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.
Raita Y; Goto T; Faridi MK; Brown DFM; Camargo CA; Hasegawa K
Crit Care; 2019 Feb; 23(1):64. PubMed ID: 30795786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ADMET evaluation in drug discovery: 15. Accurate prediction of rat oral acute toxicity using relevance vector machine and consensus modeling.
Lei T; Li Y; Song Y; Li D; Sun H; Hou T
J Cheminform; 2016; 8():6. PubMed ID: 26839598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
