These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34550172)

  • 1. Virtual audiometer: technology integrated to teaching.
    Araújo DP; Araújo MEB; Alves ERA; Jales JMR; Araújo ES
    Codas; 2021; 33(6):e20200287. PubMed ID: 34550172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of web-based audiometry version of HEARZAP.
    P PR; Ramkumar V
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283519. PubMed ID: 36976819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Comparison of two methods.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 1842286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilizing True Wireless Stereo Earbuds in Automated Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Guo Z; Yu G; Zhou H; Wang X; Lu Y; Meng Q
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211057367. PubMed ID: 34796771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multilingual audiometer simulator software for training purposes.
    Kompis M; Steffen P; Caversaccio M; Brugger U; Oesch I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 132(4):428-33. PubMed ID: 22235845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
    Rahko-Laitila P; Karma P; Laippala P; Salmelin R; Sipilä M; Manninen M; Rahko T
    Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: mobile testing without a sound-treated environment.
    Swanepoel de W; Maclennan-Smith F; Hall JW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):992-1000. PubMed ID: 24384084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-frequency audiometry. Masking in electric bone-conduction audiometry.
    Löppönen H
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 1585128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of air-conduction and bone-conduction hearing thresholds for pure tones and octave-band filtered sound effects.
    Abouchacra KS; Letowski T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):422-8. PubMed ID: 10813642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.
    Chow AHC; Cai T; McPherson B; Yang F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221405. PubMed ID: 31437206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone-conduction masking for threshold assessment in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Webb KC; Greenberg HJ
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 6628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Changes in Bone-Conduction Thresholds on Speech Audiometry in Patients Who Underwent Surgery for Otosclerosis.
    Wiatr A; Wiatr M
    J Int Adv Otol; 2020 Dec; 16(3):353-357. PubMed ID: 33136015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.