203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34550270)
1. Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ak R; Hökenek NM
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2021 Jun; 67(5):766-770. PubMed ID: 34550270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CHAMPS score in predicting mortality of patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Aydin H; Berikol GB; Erdogan MO; Gemici E; Doğan H
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(4):e20221052. PubMed ID: 37075441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Lu X; Zhang X; Chen H
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive validity of the Glasgow Blatchford Bleeding Score in an unselected emergency department population in continental Europe.
Schiefer M; Aquarius M; Leffers P; Stassen P; van Deursen C; Oostenbrug L; Jansen L; Masclee A; Keulemans YC
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Apr; 24(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 22228368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective validation of the Glasgow Blatchford scoring system in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Köksal Ö; Özeren G; Özdemır F; Armağan E; Aydin Ş; Ayyildiz T
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2012; 23(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 23161321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Morarasu BC; Sorodoc V; Haisan A; Morarasu S; Bologa C; Haliga RE; Lionte C; Marciuc EA; Elsiddig M; Cimpoesu D; Dimofte GM; Sorodoc L
World J Clin Cases; 2023 Jul; 11(19):4513-4530. PubMed ID: 37469720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COMPARISON OF NON-ENDOSCOPIC SCORES FOR THE PREDICTION OF OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL BLEED IN AN EMERGENCY OF A TERTIARY CARE REFERRAL HOSPITAL: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.
Sachan A; Dhibar DP; Bhalla A; Prakash A; Taneja S; Sharma V
Arq Gastroenterol; 2021; 58(4):534-540. PubMed ID: 34909862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.
Nakamura S; Matsumoto T; Sugimori H; Esaki M; Kitazono T; Hashizume M
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 24168099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
