BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34551145)

  • 1. A Paraffin Microtomy Method for Improved and Efficient Production of Standardized Plastic Microfibers.
    Knauss CM; Dungan CF; Lehmann SA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Apr; 41(4):944-953. PubMed ID: 34551145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective Ingestion and Egestion of Plastic Particles by the Blue Mussel (
    Ward JE; Zhao S; Holohan BA; Mladinich KM; Griffin TW; Wozniak J; Shumway SE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Aug; 53(15):8776-8784. PubMed ID: 31305074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low concentrations and low spatial variability of marine microplastics in oysters (Crassostrea virginica) in a rural Georgia estuary.
    Keisling C; Harris RD; Blaze J; Coffin J; Byers JE
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2020 Jan; 150():110672. PubMed ID: 31706723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are We Underestimating Anthropogenic Microfiber Pollution? A Critical Review of Occurrence, Methods, and Reporting.
    Athey SN; Erdle LM
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Apr; 41(4):822-837. PubMed ID: 34289522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfer and effects of PET microfibers in Chironomus riparius.
    Setyorini L; Michler-Kozma D; Sures B; Gabel F
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 757():143735. PubMed ID: 33310567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of High-Density Polyethylene Microplastics on the Survival and Development of Eastern Oyster (
    Bhatt S; Fan C; Liu M; Wolfe-Bryant B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jun; 20(12):. PubMed ID: 37372729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the Properties that Govern Selective Ingestion and Egestion of Microplastics by the Blue Mussel (
    Mladinich K; Holohan BA; Shumway SE; Brown K; Ward JE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 56(22):15770-15779. PubMed ID: 36326805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method for preparing microplastic fibers.
    Cole M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():34519. PubMed ID: 27694820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of internal persistent fluorescent fibers in tracking microplastics in vivo processes in aquatic organisms.
    Ma C; Li L; Chen Q; Lee JS; Gong J; Shi H
    J Hazard Mater; 2021 Jan; 401():123336. PubMed ID: 33113712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impacts to Larval Fathead Minnows Vary between Preconsumer and Environmental Microplastics.
    Bucci K; Bikker J; Stevack K; Watson-Leung T; Rochman C
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Apr; 41(4):858-868. PubMed ID: 33880787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between microplastics in eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and surrounding environmental compartments in Long Island Sound.
    Mladinich K; Holohan BA; Shumway SE; Ward JE
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Jul; 189():106040. PubMed ID: 37321021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microplastic Prevalence in 4 Oregon Rivers Along a Rural to Urban Gradient Applying a Cost-Effective Validation Technique.
    Valine AE; Peterson AE; Horn DA; Scully-Engelmeyer KM; Granek EF
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Aug; 39(8):1590-1598. PubMed ID: 32430919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for rapid gut clearance of microplastic polyester fibers fed to Chinook salmon: A tank study.
    Spanjer AR; Liedtke TL; Conn KE; Weiland LK; Black RW; Godfrey N
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Oct; 265(Pt A):115083. PubMed ID: 32806431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ingestion of Nanoplastics and Microplastics by Pacific Oyster Larvae.
    Cole M; Galloway TS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14625-32. PubMed ID: 26580574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research progress on occurrence characteristics and source analysis of microfibers in the marine environment.
    Chen R; Zhao X; Wu X; Wang J; Wang X; Liang W
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2024 Jan; 198():115834. PubMed ID: 38061148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Synthetic Microfiber Material Influences Ingestion by Freshwater Worms.
    Martinez SA; Simon CJ; Cohen RA
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2023 Apr; 110(5):87. PubMed ID: 37119338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of research on migration, distribution, biological effects, and analytical methods of microfibers in the environment.
    Li Y; Lu Q; Xing Y; Liu K; Ling W; Yang J; Yang Q; Wu T; Zhang J; Pei Z; Gao Z; Li X; Yang F; Ma H; Liu K; Zhao D
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158922. PubMed ID: 36155038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plastic and other microfibers in sediments, macroinvertebrates and shorebirds from three intertidal wetlands of southern Europe and west Africa.
    Lourenço PM; Serra-Gonçalves C; Ferreira JL; Catry T; Granadeiro JP
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 1):123-133. PubMed ID: 28797901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No Effect of Realistic Concentrations of Polyester Microplastic Fibers on Freshwater Zooplankton Communities.
    Klasios N; Kim JO; Tseng M
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2024 Feb; 43(2):418-428. PubMed ID: 38018737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The uptake of microfibers by freshwater Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea) varies based upon physicochemical properties.
    Li L; Su L; Cai H; Rochman CM; Li Q; Kolandhasamy P; Peng J; Shi H
    Chemosphere; 2019 Apr; 221():107-114. PubMed ID: 30640001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.