These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34551227)

  • 1. Vigilante Injustice - Deputizing and Weaponizing the Public to Stop Abortions.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Oct; 385(16):1441-1443. PubMed ID: 34551227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion as liberty and right.
    Hobin TJ
    Hum Life Rev; 2005; 31(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 16320459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
    Bertz RC
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional analysis of the Baby M decision.
    Stark B
    Harv Womens Law J; 1988; 11():19-52. PubMed ID: 16100827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.
    Cohen IG; Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HIPAA, Privacy, and Reproductive Rights in a Post-Roe Era.
    Shachar C
    JAMA; 2022 Aug; 328(5):417-418. PubMed ID: 35838680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning?
    Vinck SC
    J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal battles over abortion heat up in the USA.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2019 May; 393(10184):1923-1924. PubMed ID: 31084954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
    Vanzi LM
    N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
    Dailard C
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resignation of US judge puts reproductive rights at risk.
    Hopkins Tanne J
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7509):130. PubMed ID: 16020851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Troubling Court Decision for Reproductive Rights: Legal Recognition of Fetal Standing to Sue.
    Fox D; Adashi EY; Cohen IG
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):23-24. PubMed ID: 31116380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. US Supreme Court upholds abortion rights, for now.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2020 Jul; 396(10244):85-86. PubMed ID: 32653060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court's Crisis Pregnancy Center Case - Implications for Health Law.
    Parmet WE; Berman ML; Smith JA
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Oct; 379(16):1489-1491. PubMed ID: 30156965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.