206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34551596)
1. Safety and Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Compared to Open Repair in Infants under 1 Year of Age.
Rague JT; Arora HC; Chu DI; Shannon R; Rosoklija I; Johnson EK; Gong EM; Lindgren BW
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):432-440. PubMed ID: 34551596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?
Kafka IZ; Kocherov S; Jaber J; Chertin B
Pediatr Surg Int; 2019 Mar; 35(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 30643964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: how to reach a level of excellence?
Dothan D; Raisin G; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B
J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 32333364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort.
Bansal D; Cost NG; DeFoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Vanderbrink BA; Alam S; Sheldon CA; Noh PH
J Pediatr Urol; 2014 Apr; 10(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 24268880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants.
Avery DI; Herbst KW; Lendvay TS; Noh PH; Dangle P; Gundeti MS; Steele MC; Corbett ST; Peters CA; Kim C
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):139.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26052000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.
Chandrasekharam VVS; Babu R
J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Oct; 18(5):642-649. PubMed ID: 36117037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Robotic Pyeloplasty and Standard Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants: A Bi-Institutional Study.
Neheman A; Kord E; Zisman A; Darawsha AE; Noh PH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Apr; 28(4):467-470. PubMed ID: 29206567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons.
Spampinato G; Binet A; Fourcade L; Mendoza Sagaon M; Villemagne T; Braik K; Grosos C; Lardy H; Ballouhey Q
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):478-483. PubMed ID: 33651635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.
Salö M; Sjöberg Altemani T; Anderberg M
Pediatr Surg Int; 2016 Jun; 32(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 26833312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary vs redo robotic pyeloplasty: A comparison of outcomes.
Mittal S; Aghababian A; Eftekharzadeh S; Dinardo L; Weaver J; Weiss DA; Long C; Srinivasan AK; Shukla AR
J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):528.e1-528.e7. PubMed ID: 33766473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minilaparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty in Children Less Than 1 Year.
Masieri L; Sforza S; Cini C; Escolino M; Grosso A; Esposito C; Minervini A; Carini M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jul; 29(7):970-975. PubMed ID: 31211649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci Si system and single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system in children.
Kang SK; Jang WS; Kim SH; Kim SW; Han SW; Lee YS
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Sep; 62(5):592-599. PubMed ID: 34387035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review.
Masieri L; Sforza S; Grosso AA; Valastro F; Tellini R; Cini C; Landi L; Taverna M; Elia A; Mantovani A; Minervini A; Carini M
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Dec; 72(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 32748621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.
Andolfi C; Rodríguez VM; Galansky L; Gundeti MS
Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 34247895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), is an alternative to open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
Cohen S; Raisin G; Dothan D; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B
J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1117-1122. PubMed ID: 34859365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
